Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Na na na na hey hey goodbye! Ritabert Wednesday #1
Well sheshe2 Wednesday #2
All of the privileges of living in the US which helped him get so rich. Irish_Dem Wednesday #3
This won't affect his federal taxes, only his state taxes Jose Garcia Wednesday #13
ha. he probably doesn't pay federal taxes. Irish_Dem Wednesday #15
Probably gets DiverDave 23 hrs ago #56
Yep subsidies from the US taxpayer. Irish_Dem 22 hrs ago #57
"It worked!" say Californians as they high-five eachother. Scrivener7 Wednesday #4
Now Deleware should implement a billionaire tax. Good riddance, asshole. kysrsoze Wednesday #5
Deleware should charge a wealth tax Puppyjive Wednesday #6
Unlikely Deep State Witch Wednesday #16
Corporate law is one of the major things that needs to be re-done if the US is ever BComplex Wednesday #28
We money spending consumers bake the economic cookies, the rich eat most of them and leave us the crumbs. nt Exp Wednesday #7
A wealth tax to fund healthcare Bayard Wednesday #8
They should charge him a leaving tax Mr. Sparkle Wednesday #9
LOL!! Brilliant!! BComplex Wednesday #29
It's a double edged sword The Grand Illuminist Wednesday #10
It's been working out well in Massachusetts, which actually has more millionaires now TheRickles Wednesday #22
Totally different, not the same at all. Abolishinist Yesterday #50
True, but they're both aiming for the same redistributive goals, though via different means. TheRickles Yesterday #55
Regadless of when he left, if the wealth tax is approved he will have to pay because it is retroactive to 1/1/25 and in2herbs Wednesday #11
The Constitution specifically prohibits states from passing retroactive laws Jose Garcia Wednesday #14
With regards to criminal laws, yes, but not with regards to civil laws. See below: in2herbs Wednesday #33
Good riddance. Martin68 Wednesday #12
Killing the goose that lays the golden eggs The Mouth Wednesday #17
Check the tax rates under Reagan Easterncedar Wednesday #19
The problem is that the rich can just up and move The Mouth Wednesday #47
That makes corporations sound like they are necessarily benefitting their State in kind. BComplex Wednesday #30
The Laffer Curve was debunked long ago DBoon Wednesday #43
Wealth is mobile The Mouth Wednesday #48
The Laffer Curve proposed that lowering taxes creates overall economic prosperity DBoon Yesterday #52
I didn't quote, or refer to the Laffer curve, that was someone else The Mouth 15 hrs ago #61
How fucking greedy can you get? Ray Bruns Wednesday #18
These money-hoarders have an addiction to money. MLWR Wednesday #20
I think the oldigarchs addiction to money and power is because they will soon be dead , afraid their power will wane, in2herbs Wednesday #34
Not dead fast enough. diane in sf Wednesday #38
I agree! nt in2herbs Wednesday #39
It is game to the super rich SheLiberal Wednesday #41
Welp Pas-de-Calais Wednesday #21
Oh, boo, hoo, hoo... Pay your damn fair share... electric_blue68 Wednesday #23
Thanks California for helping us become billionaires Smilo Wednesday #24
Hahaha! One more billionaire mansion in Texas they can't sell. Joinfortmill Wednesday #25
Isnt Gavin Newsome against this tax? Callie1979 Wednesday #26
Ballot Analysis of Initiative 2025-024 quaint Wednesday #27
Page moved, but the major companies of Alphabet haven't. CA may be a little tax poorer, but not enough to affect ancianita Wednesday #31
If you sleep on someone's couch and you don't pay rent, you're a moocher. Initech 22 hrs ago #58
I hear you. ancianita 22 hrs ago #59
Link to text of initiative, California Secretary of State office GJGCA Wednesday #32
The sun in California shines a bit brighter today Sweet Rosie Red Wednesday #35
Bye, Felicia. QueerDuck Wednesday #36
Welp lonely bird Wednesday #37
The greed and selfishness of these people are beyond belief. Mebbe I'm wrong, but I don't think Larry is going to end up Fil1957 Wednesday #40
You don't own California. You don't own the people of this state. DBoon Wednesday #42
Come on! The man's gotta eat. Swede Wednesday #44
Make these assholes pay! They can't keep mooching forever! Initech Wednesday #45
Tech billionaires have contempt for everyone not in their class DBoon Wednesday #46
Page is moving because, after the new tax, he'd ONLY have 256,500,000,000 dollars? LudwigPastorius Yesterday #49
Bye RandySF Yesterday #51
He SHOULD be shamed as one of the greediest men in the world by every lawmaker and every media outlet. Doodley Yesterday #53
Good UpInArms Yesterday #54
Instead of a wealth tax.... Happy Hoosier 22 hrs ago #60
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Google co-founder leaves ...»Reply #5