Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Donald Trump Says He'd Denaturalize US Citizens 'In a Heartbeat' [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(175,017 posts)7. How the Supreme Court Rejected Denaturalization as a Political Weapon Long Ago
Tonight, trump announced that he wants to revoke the citizenship of naturalized US citizens.
Link to tweet
We are fortunate that the SCOTUS has addressed this issue
Link to tweet
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/how-supreme-court-rejected-denaturalization-political-weapon-long-ago
The Trump administration and its supporters have made numerous threats to revoke the citizenship of political foes who are naturalized citizens. But if the government tries to follow through, it will have an uphill legal battle.....
Under the law today, the government may seek denaturalization proceedings either when naturalization is obtained illegally or disqualifying facts on citizenship applications are concealed. But throughout much of the 20th century, it was much easier to achieve.....
A few years later, the Supreme Court warned against using denaturalization proceedings as a political weapon. Ill-tempered expressions, extreme views, even the promotion of ideas which run counter to our American ideals, are not to be given disloyal connotations in absence of solid, convincing evidence that that is their significance, the Courts majority wrote. Any other course would run counter to our traditions, and make denaturalization proceedings the ready instrument for political persecutions.
In 1967, the Court found that under the 14th Amendment, the government cannot forcibly deprive a naturalized American of citizenship without the citizens consent, except when citizenship is unlawfully procured.
In the succeeding decades, denaturalizations declined significantly. Between 1990 and 2017, the Justice Department filed an average of just 11 cases per year. Only during the Obama administration did they climb, when new technology allowed the government to search decades of data for indicators of possible fraud. In 2016, the yearly average rose to 15. During the first Trump administration, the program expanded, increasing the average to 25 per year.....
The second Trump administration is picking up where the last one left off, filing at least 25 cases in the first 10 months of 2025. Based on publicly available information, these cases are not obviously aimed at political viewpoints. But any attempt to use denaturalization as a political weapon will run into significant legal hurdles. The Supreme Courts firmly established limits on the process are not only robust, but also deeply rooted in protections guaranteed by the 1st and 14th Amendments.
Under the law today, the government may seek denaturalization proceedings either when naturalization is obtained illegally or disqualifying facts on citizenship applications are concealed. But throughout much of the 20th century, it was much easier to achieve.....
A few years later, the Supreme Court warned against using denaturalization proceedings as a political weapon. Ill-tempered expressions, extreme views, even the promotion of ideas which run counter to our American ideals, are not to be given disloyal connotations in absence of solid, convincing evidence that that is their significance, the Courts majority wrote. Any other course would run counter to our traditions, and make denaturalization proceedings the ready instrument for political persecutions.
In 1967, the Court found that under the 14th Amendment, the government cannot forcibly deprive a naturalized American of citizenship without the citizens consent, except when citizenship is unlawfully procured.
In the succeeding decades, denaturalizations declined significantly. Between 1990 and 2017, the Justice Department filed an average of just 11 cases per year. Only during the Obama administration did they climb, when new technology allowed the government to search decades of data for indicators of possible fraud. In 2016, the yearly average rose to 15. During the first Trump administration, the program expanded, increasing the average to 25 per year.....
The second Trump administration is picking up where the last one left off, filing at least 25 cases in the first 10 months of 2025. Based on publicly available information, these cases are not obviously aimed at political viewpoints. But any attempt to use denaturalization as a political weapon will run into significant legal hurdles. The Supreme Courts firmly established limits on the process are not only robust, but also deeply rooted in protections guaranteed by the 1st and 14th Amendments.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Donald Trump Says He'd Denaturalize US Citizens 'In a Heartbeat' [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Thursday
OP
Hmmm, I don't think the orange turd can actually do that...He fancies himself to be a Greek God or something...
wcmagumba
Thursday
#1
DOn't be ridiculous. Nothing like that takes decades to get to the Supreme Court
Wiz Imp
Thursday
#22
Trump is not omnipotent and you significantly overrate his ability to delay things.
Wiz Imp
Thursday
#26
I'm sorry, (not really) but that is the most ridiculous post today so far,
MarineCombatEngineer
Thursday
#31
Legal analysis from Professor Vladeck on trump's ability to strip someone of their US Citizenship
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
#5
How the Supreme Court Rejected Denaturalization as a Political Weapon Long Ago
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
#7
It's an empty threat, primarily directed at non-whites and non-English speaking citizens
FakeNoose
Thursday
#11
A part of me hopes he establish a precedent that will allow a sane president to exile bigots.
unblock
Thursday
#10
That f..ker he'd do it in a heart beat if they were dishonest. All we get from him and his entire cabal is dishonesty
PortTack
Thursday
#12
Trump like the racist he is, wants to ruin the lives of all MN Somalis over a few listed among many others in ONE
ancianita
Thursday
#13
First that makes total sense, they hate America so they made it their home. You idiot.
Buddyzbuddy
Thursday
#15
Then denaturalize the children of Russian and Eastern European immigrants
ChicagoTeamster
Thursday
#35