Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,323 posts)
25. What has happened since the Raygun '80s, was banking deregulation
Sat Jan 10, 2026, 05:31 AM
Jan 10

I.e., a number of banks that actually host/issue those credit cards, will domicile/charter their card entities in states with no cap or a high cap. The most common state is South Dakota, where you will see this -

Fact brief: Is South Dakota one of the friendliest states for credit card companies?

Yes.

South Dakota landed several major credit card companies after 1980 because of the state’s lack of laws restricting interest rates.

In the 1970s, credit card companies were losing money with every swipe because most states had laws that capped interest rates.

The lack of a usury law in South Dakota combined with a Supreme Court ruling that said companies could use the state’s laws where the company was headquartered led to a financial boom. Even if a card was used in another state, South Dakota laws governed interest rates.

(snip)


The linked article lists 3 big issuers - Wells Fargo, Citi and First PREMIER Bank - who established their cards there (and many small orgs with cards in their own names, are actually issued by banks like those, through an agreement).

The unanimous SCOTUS ruling that established this -

Marquette Nat. Bank v. First of Omaha Svc. Corp., 439 U.S. 299 (1978)

(snip)

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question for decision is whether the National Bank Act, Rev.Stat. § 5197, as amended, 12 U.S. C § 5, [Footnote 1] authorizes a national bank based in one State to charge its out-of-state credit-card customers an interest rate on unpaid balances allowed by its home State, when that rate is greater than that permitted by the State of the bank's nonresident customers. The Minnesota Supreme Court held that the bank is allowed by § 85 to charge the higher rate. 262 N.W.2d 358 (1977). We affirm.

(snip)


So this means a card holder needs to REALLY research where their card issuer's credit card unit is domiciled, otherwise years after some low "introductory interest rate", that rate can suddenly change to the max rate of the state where the card is issued from, not from the state where the holder resides.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sign over the bar "free beer tomorrow" Klarkashton Jan 9 #1
He's just trying to increase the repuglican pac donations from the credit card carriers. It will never pass. mdbl Jan 9 #2
He been floating an answer to every gripe. Klarkashton Jan 9 #4
One of our local trolls is going to be very concerned about why "We Dems" didn't think of this first Prairie Gates Jan 9 #21
Republicans hated Joe Biden's student loan programs bucolic_frolic Jan 9 #3
if this actually takes effect moonshinegnomie Jan 9 #5
"considering"... Trump doesn't. Norrrm Jan 9 #7
Wrong! Multichromatic Jan 10 #23
I wonder how many millions will then lose their credit card accounts.... Mark.b2 Jan 9 #6
my guess is most of them moonshinegnomie Jan 9 #9
Good points.... Mark.b2 Jan 9 #12
What's past is prologue Multichromatic Jan 10 #24
What has happened since the Raygun '80s, was banking deregulation BumRushDaShow Jan 10 #25
the will just wholesalfe cancel credit cards moonshinegnomie Jan 10 #31
I don't know that a US President has the power to do that. 70sEraVet Jan 9 #8
that requires congress moonshinegnomie Jan 9 #10
I'm sure you're right about that. 70sEraVet Jan 9 #11
The little people can't take advantage of tax deductions. They are taking the standard deduction and getting money... Ol Janx Spirit Jan 9 #15
Before the mid-terms, Trump will promise us all a new car and a Trump phone. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Jan 9 #13
Trump then called for a Chihuahua in every pot Bristlecone Jan 9 #14
This is what he does: he says it--expecting credit for it. And it is probably true more often than not... Ol Janx Spirit Jan 9 #16
These are useless things just meant to get some headlines JI7 Jan 9 #17
He spews a firehose of crazy every day tonekat Jan 9 #18
More smoke & mirrors - epstein,epstein,epstein Nigrum Cattus Jan 9 #19
The Age of BIG GOVERNMENT, I guess Prairie Gates Jan 9 #20
The credit card companies would have to agree to do that and they won't. SunSeeker Jan 10 #22
Credit Card Companies would have to cancel some people's cards................. Lovie777 Jan 10 #26
Credit limits will plummet wolfie001 Jan 10 #29
Sounds like he is in panic mode over the economy. Raven123 Jan 10 #27
More socialism by the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Jan 10 #28
Hey while we're spouting populist pablum why not raise the minimum wage by ten percent for a year or until after the... Hugin Jan 10 #30
Desperado Don's Full-of-Shit Proclamations are oasis Jan 10 #32
Thanks for posting this. RoseTrellis Jan 10 #33
Alright, whose check didn't clear? Chase? Discover, this your fault? flvegan Jan 10 #34
This is a silly 1 year tiny bandaid proposal. delisen Jan 10 #35
I had to get a new CC because my airline card switched from Barclays to Citi. The switch will be automatic sometime Raftergirl Jan 11 #36
I never use a credit card any more, just a debit card when I need to order something online. CTyankee Jan 11 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump calls for one year ...»Reply #25