Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Online outrage over Ohio rape case prompts city website [View all]happyslug
(14,779 posts)77. She did recuse herself on August 27, 2012, the rape was reported in August 14, 2012
http://www.wtov9.com/news/news/special-prosecutors-handle-jefferson-county-rape-i/nRLhZ/
The rape was reported on August 14, 2012:
http://www.wtov9.com/news/news/breaking-news-steubenville-teens-officially-charge/nRJsQ/
It takes time for things like that to work its way through the court system. She can NOT just go to her boss and asked to be re-assigned, she had to go to ANOTHER elected official in another city and ask him to take over. It is a very rare situation, thus it takes time, two weeks sounds about right. I do NOT know how she could have recursed herself any faster, such recusal is NOT something you just give a call to the Attorney General, you first call his office, and tell him why, and then the two work out the how, when and who. In the mean time the Prosecutor is still on charge of the case, for an arrest has been made the the 180 time period to have a speedy trial would have started to kick in. If the trial does NOT start within 180 days, the accused right to a speedy trial would have been violated and the case would have had to be dismissed, is that what you wanted? The only person who can delay the trial beyond 180 days is the defendants (who often do), but the Defendants do so to prepare their side NOT to help the prosecution. Thus the prosecutor's recusal (and the assignment of an out of county Judge) sounds proper and remember it did occur in AUGUST.
The rape was reported on August 14, 2012:
http://www.wtov9.com/news/news/breaking-news-steubenville-teens-officially-charge/nRJsQ/
It takes time for things like that to work its way through the court system. She can NOT just go to her boss and asked to be re-assigned, she had to go to ANOTHER elected official in another city and ask him to take over. It is a very rare situation, thus it takes time, two weeks sounds about right. I do NOT know how she could have recursed herself any faster, such recusal is NOT something you just give a call to the Attorney General, you first call his office, and tell him why, and then the two work out the how, when and who. In the mean time the Prosecutor is still on charge of the case, for an arrest has been made the the 180 time period to have a speedy trial would have started to kick in. If the trial does NOT start within 180 days, the accused right to a speedy trial would have been violated and the case would have had to be dismissed, is that what you wanted? The only person who can delay the trial beyond 180 days is the defendants (who often do), but the Defendants do so to prepare their side NOT to help the prosecution. Thus the prosecutor's recusal (and the assignment of an out of county Judge) sounds proper and remember it did occur in AUGUST.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
you are right. of course this is nto a first and wont be the last. but, i have never heard
seabeyond
Jan 2013
#37
Yeah, like you're going to get any information from those trying to cover it up
Tempest
Jan 2013
#58
Alexandria Goddard does say the rape occurred at a COACH's House, not the Prosecutor's house
happyslug
Jan 2013
#64
The Blog you cite, implies otherwise, but says the Prosecutor did nothing wrong
happyslug
Jan 2013
#69
Jane Hanlin is the mother of one of the witnesses to the rapes that took place at her house.
yardwork
Jan 2013
#76
She did recuse herself on August 27, 2012, the rape was reported in August 14, 2012
happyslug
Jan 2013
#77
Why did she meet with the victim and her family and discourage them from filing charges?
yardwork
Jan 2013
#78
So what is the Felony that the other teens SAW? And how do you prove "Knowing".
happyslug
Jan 2013
#60
Um....the victim doesn't need a defense. You would be a juror I would pick, though,
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#89
Does the web site address the issue of missing evidence while in the sheriff's possession?
Tempest
Jan 2013
#3
The fact that that's the main thing people there are worried about is telling, isn't it?
Posteritatis
Jan 2013
#26
are local RW radio blowhards defending the rapists? - this is a more specific situation but
certainot
Jan 2013
#44
thanks- what a fucking asshole that guy is, but he is one of many making excuses like that.
certainot
Jan 2013
#71
WWVA1170 is a limbaugh hannity beck savage station AND piggybacks West Virginia Mountaineers and the
certainot
Jan 2013
#73
so I guess these residents don't mind their high school being a rapist's haven
SemperEadem
Jan 2013
#49