Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Aussie105

(7,666 posts)

22. 'We have millions of Epstein related documents to redact!'

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Jan 16, 2026, 07:51 PM

Friday

Epstein was never that important, so that is just a red herring.

And why not release them unredacted? (Rhetorical question, that is.)

Let the names of the guilty and victims shine forth!
Open government, full disclosure, that sort of thing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Epstein Files Update as Pam Bondi Admits 'Glitches' [View all] BumRushDaShow Friday OP

Pam Bondi is upset because the veterans are leaving the DOJ because she knows she Baitball Blogger Friday #1

Her only job is to protect Trump and the GOP. travelingthrulife Friday #7

Exactly! sheshe2 Friday #23

I have a different take on it. drray23 Friday #25

Release as they go RockCreek Friday #2

Yes, we're not greedy. JawJaw Friday #8

Show the judge what you have TODAY bluestarone Friday #3

Standard "run out the clock" tactic PSPS Friday #4

I think we all know whose anonymity the DOJ is concerned with, at this point. Paladin Friday #5

Guess the king's name is showing up too often so it's taking longer to redact. Vinca Friday #6

We're gonna need a bigger box of Sharpies. Marie Marie Friday #11

It wouldn't be dufficult to get someone to read to you if you can't, well, read. twodogsbarking Friday #9

"Glitches" LiberalLovinLug Friday #10

She is purposely suppressing evidence and obstructing justice. hadEnuf Friday #12

AMEN! You nailed it! ancianita Yesterday #32

Zero consequences, as usual. It'll get "completed" when they damn well please. flvegan Friday #13

Lying nazi scum she is wolfie001 Friday #14

Gawd... 2naSalit Friday #16

..... wolfie001 Friday #17

Well... 2naSalit Friday #15

nothing but azureblue Friday #18

"Inevitable Glitches" WestMichRad Friday #19

ONE percent so far Evolve Dammit Friday #20

She means Trump is all over the files pfitz59 Friday #21

'We have millions of Epstein related documents to redact!' Aussie105 Friday #22

Hey Pammy think of what is going to happen after the mid terms..............you have had these documents turbinetree Friday #24

Thomas Massie said he could go on the floor and read the names vapor2 Friday #26

Bondi is obviously stalling and the court can fashion a remedy evilclown Friday #27

Redacting the victim's names and releasing all the files should only take a few days rickford66 Friday #28

glitch my ass! orleans Yesterday #29

Glitches as in Mierda47's name appears too much, and they don't have enough black ink to cover it all! n/t aggiesal Yesterday #30

The DOJ is supposed follow the crime & see who gets caught in the net & indict those in the net ... aggiesal Yesterday #31