Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

muriel_volestrangler

(105,670 posts)

3. Starmer has already said he won't suggest that, because it's not "pragmatic" or "in the national interest"

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Mon Jan 19, 2026, 09:02 AM

Yesterday

"I'm focused on the pragmatic response here, not the suggestion of others, and my focus is what's in the national interest for our country, what is going to best protect workers, families, businesses."

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220949720#post3

He didn't, in the entire press conference, actually say there was anything he would do, apart from talk.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Munu

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Calls for King Charles to Cancel US Trip Follow Greenland Tariffs Threat [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Lest you forget. It is 2025 and there are still kings. Lunacy. twodogsbarking Yesterday #1

God how some love their royals!😵‍💫 Floyd R. Turbo Yesterday #4

We don't love ours.... Blumancru 11 hrs ago #18

👍🏻 Floyd R. Turbo 9 hrs ago #19

Show Kings that were neutered from being authoritarian hundreds of years ago Bengus81 Yesterday #5

We Have The Rockettes twodogsbarking Yesterday #7

2026 even. progressoid Yesterday #8

Got me. The first time I wrote the new year I put down 2036. It's Wednesday and I don't know what the hell is going on. twodogsbarking Yesterday #9

... Wednesdays Yesterday #15

Heck, I have to check my phone calendar every day to see what's going on. progressoid Yesterday #17

According to some Brits, the royals are a revenue + operation. paleotn Yesterday #13

It is, however, a long time since a British head of state threatened to attack allies for their own gratification muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #16

It will be interesting to see if a "King" Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #2

Real king shouldn't even think of it. paleotn Yesterday #11

Starmer has already said he won't suggest that, because it's not "pragmatic" or "in the national interest" muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #3

It ultimately may be up to the king to decide. mwmisses4289 Yesterday #6

Yeah, I had been thinking he could use that as an excuse muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #14

Starmer, it's going to get bad for the UK's national interests no matter what you do, paleotn Yesterday #12

Charles looks extremely annoying. twodogsbarking Yesterday #10