Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(7,009 posts)
17. I'm not sure about search warrants....
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 09:45 PM
12 hrs ago

.... With subpoenas they can be challenged after being served, but with a search warrant they just show up and start searching. I think that's a feature, not a bug, because it doesn't allow the suspect to destroy or hide evidence. HOWEVER, if it goes to court, you can move to have the evidence thrown out if the warrant was defective.

One thing to remember is that Fulton Co is a special case. Normally, the retention period for election results is 22 months there. Normally, the seized material would have been disposed of long ago, but in this case they were under a court order to preserve it. Other states and counties would not have results laying around to be seized.

It is also the case that secretaries of state are closely cooperating with one another, and if this became a widespread general practice they would all start fighting back.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI executes search warra...»Reply #17