Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,118 posts)
2. Yeah, and he's glaringly (imho) missing from the witness list for upcoming House hearings
Sun Feb 1, 2026, 10:59 AM
Yesterday

Instead it's just a who's who of Trump/magaworld's "Deep State" enemies (Clintons, Comey, Holder, Lynch, Mueller, Barr, Sessions, Alberto Gonzalez). The GQP House is going try to make it look like the DoJ was corrupt and "protecting Pedos" (which of course doesn't include Trump in their telling). The fact that Acosta won't be part of them trying to manifest that storyline is suspicious to me. He might be someone who'd get up there and answer "yes" to the question of "were you investigating Donald Trump for his Epstein ties" back then, and tell the world why, and they don't want that. Plus, of course, Trump hired Acosta in Trump v1.0.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»2007 memo laying out Epst...»Reply #2