Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flashman13

(2,194 posts)
6. I find this very sad. Not that people are buying guns and learning how to use them.
Sun Feb 1, 2026, 05:37 PM
Yesterday

It's perfectly understandable. The sad part is that anyone should feel the need to violently protect themselves from fellow Americans.

I want to give my friends at DU some advice if they are contemplating arming themselves. Before you do, go sit down in a quiet room. Think very deeply about what it means to fire a gun at someone. You must understand that you will seriously injure or kill them. Search your heart, your soul, pray on it if that's appropriate. Ask yourself, at the moment of crisis can I pull that trigger? If your answer is yes, think about it some more. Remember, real life is not the movies. You don't converse with your assailant. Nano seconds count. In war there is a one simple rule. In a fight it is him or me. Make damned sure it's him. The other side of the coin is that it is far worse to brandish a gun and then not be able to use it than it is to not have a gun at all. When you show your gun, you put him on notice that he is in mortal danger. He will opt for rule one. For a normal person the whole idea is horrific. Damn Trump to hell for making us have to have this conversation.

On a personal note, for years my ex badgered me to buy her a gun and teach her how to use it. I refused because I knew her well enough to know that if push came to shove, she would not use the gun. She would hesitate. As I said, in a crisis situation it is better to not have a gun than to scare an attacker into using their gun.

For as long as I can remember, I have scoffed at the NRA types that always said that the reason for the Second Amendment was so citizens could defend themselves against a tyrannical government. I never for a moment thought that was true. At this point it is hard to deny that they may have been right. I still hope with all my heart that they were wrong.

Recommendations

10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What if these "left-leaning gun rights activists" are buying guns to protect their homes from ICE because in2herbs Yesterday #1
"NOT GUILTY" for the occupants, after ICE agents get themselves shot while breaking into those homes.... Jack Valentino 20 hrs ago #15
Liberals also have guns. Republicans also have abortions. Norrrm Yesterday #2
You know what, he's going to do it anyway. tonekat Yesterday #3
Sorry liberalgunwilltravel Yesterday #5
I am reminded more and more of the Frederick Douglas quote about the fugitive slave act: Jack Valentino 20 hrs ago #16
My exact sentiments! Wuddles440 7 hrs ago #38
Big difference Bayard Yesterday #4
Yeah, but they can't shoot more than two of them at once, Jack Valentino 19 hrs ago #17
I find this very sad. Not that people are buying guns and learning how to use them. flashman13 Yesterday #6
The only time I ever fired a gun moonscape 22 hrs ago #9
You are a very wise person. Stay safe my friend. flashman13 22 hrs ago #10
They were RIGHT--- that is, CORRECT--- that the 2nd Amendment could be a defense against Jack Valentino 19 hrs ago #18
In the gun culture they believe that the Second Amendment is the holy grail of the Constitution. flashman13 17 hrs ago #32
This right here orangecrush Yesterday #7
Too small a caliber---- if you choose to employ DEADLY FORCE for self-defense, Jack Valentino 19 hrs ago #19
It's really funny orangecrush 19 hrs ago #21
You may be quite correct--- and as I stated a .22 can be quite lethal--- Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #23
I see your point orangecrush 18 hrs ago #25
That gun was 'standard issue' for almost 100 years..... for US Armed forces.... Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #28
If it ain't broke... orangecrush 17 hrs ago #31
Yep, first sidearm I carried in Vietnam, along with my M-14, and later, my M-16. nt MarineCombatEngineer 8 hrs ago #37
So Trump will leave us alone if we don't have guns? hadEnuf 23 hrs ago #8
So you claim that this is falling right into Trumpedos's hands? MarineCombatEngineer 21 hrs ago #11
I 100% agree with you , MCE. AZ8theist 12 hrs ago #33
For those interested, this is a great gun club for Liberals/Progressives: MarineCombatEngineer 21 hrs ago #12
My best friend lives in Tempe AZ, and we often discussed the gun laws there.... Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #24
in July of 2010, AZ became a constitutional carry state, however to conceal carry in other states MarineCombatEngineer 8 hrs ago #36
I've had guns for years. Grew up with them. Got my CC permit as soon as my state allowed it. Seeking Serenity 21 hrs ago #13
That is the issue at times. OldBaldy1701E 9 hrs ago #35
A population arming itself more so than before . . . Aussie105 21 hrs ago #14
The United States of America only had ONE "civil war" previously--- Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #29
"...feel the need to violently protect themselves from fellow Americans." J_William_Ryan 19 hrs ago #20
"a hypothetical future tyrannical government" J_William_Ryan 18 hrs ago #22
You here quoted ME here, possibly replying to the wrong person... Jack Valentino 17 hrs ago #30
Karma JBTaurus83 18 hrs ago #26
But...but...but the Reich-wingers said they have "all the guns???" Grins 18 hrs ago #27
Their burbling about 'Fighting Tyranny' was always bullshit RetiredParatrooper 10 hrs ago #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Leftist and liberal gun g...»Reply #6