Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RockRaven

(18,911 posts)
5. "for a documentary" doing heroic heavy lifting there...
Mon Feb 2, 2026, 12:10 AM
6 hrs ago

"Well, it's a flop by those budget standards, but great revenue for a documentary" -- DOCUMENTARIES NEVER COST THIS MUCH, so measure it by the budget not the film category.

To give a sense of the aberrant scale of cost difference we're talking about:
James Cameron's documentary about the Titanic, Ghosts of the Abyss, using cutting-edge custom-built submersibles/ROVs to film the actual wreckage at the bottom of the ocean... Budget $13M.
March of the Penguins, a film shot in Antarctica which means hostile conditions and hellacious logistics... Budget $8M.
Free Solo, an Oscar winning documentary in the late 2010s about free climber Alex Honnold doing the first ever free solo climb of El Capitan in Yosemite... Budget $2M.



But, yeah, $7M, this country has a hell of a lot of fart-sniffing worms in it.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Melania,' panned by some...»Reply #5