Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Breaking: Judge Reduces Possible Sentence for Manning (Unlawful Pretrial Punishment) [View all]struggle4progress
(126,388 posts)41. Bradley Manning granted 112-day reduction in possible sentence
Judge rules that Manning had suffered excessively harsh treatment but reduction falls far short of defence team's hopes
Ed Pilkington at Fort Meade, Maryland
Tuesday 8 January 2013 17.23 EST
... "The charges are serious in this case and there was no intent to punish. There is no argument to dismiss the charges," the judge said.
Beyond dismissal, the defence had called for a diminution of Manning's sentence according to a ratio of 10 days reduction for every day of excessive treatment, to run for the entire duration of the nine months of the soldier's confinement at Quantico. That would have resulted in more than seven years being taken off his sentence.
But in the end, the judge agreed only to a straight day-for-day ratio, and further limited the duration of the reduction to narrowly defined periods where she found excessive treatment had taken place.
Specifically, she granted Manning seven days off any sentence for the seven days when he was kept on the most restrictive regime, known as Suicide Risk, against the advice of psychiatrists the only Article 13 violation accepted by the prosecution; 75 days off sentence for when he was kept on the only slightly less onerous status of "prevention of injury", also against professional opinion; 20 days for having his underwear removed unduly after he made a joke that he could use that to harm himself; and 10 days for being granted just 20 minutes of recreation outside his cell every day when he should have been given a full hour ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/08/bradley-manning-112-day-reduction-possible-sentence
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Breaking: Judge Reduces Possible Sentence for Manning (Unlawful Pretrial Punishment) [View all]
Hissyspit
Jan 2013
OP
Not a single charge dismissed then? Wow...this is a prosecution victory, then. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#2
Yes. 22 charges untouched, including the most serious, with an easily-proved intent
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#34
... Lind rejected a defense contention that brig commanders were influenced by higher-ranking Marine
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#49
Did he work at Fort Meade at NSA? Just wondering. There was a book written about that
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2013
#5
Then I wonder how Romney passed his security clearance testing. Surely when they asked him to draw a
okaawhatever
Jan 2013
#7
Something like that. Why would they ask such a personal question like that. Funny
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2013
#26
Like I said I was 19yrs old. Now am 65 this Friday. So it was a very long time ago.
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2013
#29
Well I read it in my younger days. I don't know if you could even get it today. But it was
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2013
#32
Judge did not rule Manning was tortured: judged ruled his confinement was "more rigorous
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#44
Are they ever? Well, unless someone needs to make a showing of pretending to be against torture
Solly Mack
Jan 2013
#16
... “There was no intent to punish the accused...The intent was to make sure the accused was safe,
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#42
He's already discussing pleading to some of the charges. He's not getting acquitted, and he
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#35
Judge did not rule Manning was tortured: judged ruled his confinement was "more rigorous
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#39
So what is it, 1 year per document? Final sentence, 250,000 years...less 112 days of course.
24601
Jan 2013
#17
... Lind said Manning’s treatment at Quantico was “more rigorous than necessary” and
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#36
... Nonetheless, she said, “dismissal of charges is not appropriate” and would be fitting only
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#38
Judge Says Harsh Detention Is Not Cause to Drop Charges in WikiLeaks Case
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#37
Watch for another delay of trial from the defense....I suspect a plea is in the
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#40
I can call it, can't I? And there are certain posters on this board who doubt if I am an attorney
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#52
... Manning's lawyer, David Coombs, on Wednesday introduced a revised proposal under which the young
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#47
... Manning seeks to prove at trial that he used his experience to conclude that the documents were
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#48
Your modification of the AP headline is misleading: the judge did not find
struggle4progress
Jan 2013
#43
but the judge says he was excessively strong armed, and mistreated it sounds like to me but the best
Divine Discontent
Jan 2013
#53