Apple is reportedly planning to launch AI-powered glasses, a pendant, and AirPods

[Polybius]

41. I'll clear this up directly: it's me writing the replies

I’ve been drafting a lot of them offline in Notepad because they’re long and I don’t want to lose them if the page refreshes (and I do it in in bits and pieces on Notepad). When I paste them in, sometimes the formatting shifts. Bullets compress, em dashes change, spacing changes, etc.. The tone shifted because I am passionate about the subject and wanted to respond carefully instead of casually firing off short comments.

That’s it.

I get why generative AI has made people suspicious. It’s created a weird environment where you can’t always tell what’s human-written. But structured writing, longer paragraphs, or punctuation changes aren’t proof of anything. Plenty of people write in a deliberate, organized way when they care about the subject.

And I do care about this subject. That’s the real “shift.” When something feels mischaracterized, I tend to slow down and write more thoroughly. That’s passion, not automation.

On the broader point: I understand your distrust of Meta and of generative AI generally. You see it as built on scraped data, corporate power, and potential social harm. I don’t dismiss that concern. But defending a product like the Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses doesn’t automatically mean I endorse every corporate practice behind AI training datasets or that I’m indifferent to intellectual property debates.

You’re also right that AI creates ambiguity in social interactions — whether someone is being coached, assisted, or augmented. That’s a cultural shift we’re still adjusting to. But that ambiguity exists whether I personally use AI tools or not. It’s already part of the digital landscape.

We probably won’t agree on the larger philosophical divide. You see generative AI and wearable tech as corrosive to authenticity and human trust. I see them as tools with tradeoffs that require norms and guardrails but aren’t inherently dehumanizing.

But at least on one point, I can remove the uncertainty: these replies are mine. The formatting quirks are just copy-paste artifacts and me trying to write clearly about something I’m genuinely engaged in — not a chatbot speaking for me.