Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

reACTIONary

(7,261 posts)

3. Nine to Zero...

Reply to angrychair (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 29, 2026, 11:30 PM

Wednesday

.... so the liberals on the court are now fascist?

In principle, this is a ruling that supports first amendment rights in the face of legal harassment. Doesn't sound fascist to me.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rhiannon12866 Polybius

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Sides With Anti-Abortion Clinic in Fight Over Donor Records [View all] Polybius Wednesday OP

SCOTUS angrychair Wednesday #1

Nine to Zero... reACTIONary Wednesday #3

It is fascist angrychair 23 hrs ago #4

"If the system is supporting and protecting people... reACTIONary 22 hrs ago #6

This case angrychair 20 hrs ago #7

The most recent example is... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #9

As I said in post 19... pat_k 12 hrs ago #20

Regarding unanimous decisions... Polybius 13 hrs ago #17

I did angrychair 13 hrs ago #18

9-0 eggplant Wednesday #2

It likely does not angrychair 20 hrs ago #8

Since the 1950s.... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #10

Courts are for people that can afford it angrychair 19 hrs ago #12

As a person who pursued a pro se case for more than five years against the servicer and noteholder of two mortgages pat_k 9 hrs ago #22

That is clearly Gorsuch's Christian nationalist agenda -- i.e., declare it "constitutional" to impose PERSONAL religious pat_k 11 hrs ago #21

**********THIS IS A 9-0 RULING*************** Prairie Gates 23 hrs ago #5

The court asks us to just ask ourselves... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #11

As I just posted a second ago angrychair 19 hrs ago #13

I don't understand this. I think you are maintaining that.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #14

I think you are missing my point angrychair 18 hrs ago #15

So you want the Supreme court to undo a precedent.... reACTIONary 17 hrs ago #16

Not a bad decision. They can challenge. Doesn't mean they'll win. pat_k 13 hrs ago #19