Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

bluestarone

(22,420 posts)

6. You see, THIS is the scary part. These six FUCKERS can rule their way for ANY reason, and

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2026, 10:05 AM

Yesterday

NOTHING we can do about it. These are what i call their TEST decisions. Look out for what they really want to to us in America. It's coming, that's for sure!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Attilatheblond Multichromatic LeftInTX dave99

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme court's Voting Rights Act ruling cited misleading data from DoJ [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

His mind was already made up................. Lovie777 Yesterday #1

He had a conclusion already determined. All he needed was manipulated data Baitball Blogger Yesterday #3

My first thought, too... IthinkThereforeIAM Yesterday #4

John Roberts Lied...........he has been a racists POS since Reagan he lied when he got confirmed turbinetree Yesterday #2

I thought Roberts was W's POS lawyer spewing venom to get the FL recount stopped. GreenWave Yesterday #5

You see, THIS is the scary part. These six FUCKERS can rule their way for ANY reason, and bluestarone Yesterday #6

we can can cancel them dave99 20 hrs ago #19

Racism didn't end, white voters just got lazy and didn't vote in same % Attilatheblond Yesterday #7

You mean trumps DOJ supplied misleading republianmushroom Yesterday #8

GIGO yankee87 Yesterday #9

I'm sure the decision was pre-determined, but I'm curious what the numbers would've looked like TheRickles Yesterday #10

Try reading the linked article. There are graphs and plenty of numbers. It's quite damning. TheRickles Yesterday #11

The Guardian "ran the numbers" and their findings are in the article BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #12

Very clear results, thanks. TheRickles 23 hrs ago #13

Yeah I saw after I posted because I was taking some time to do screenshots of the plots BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago #14

No worries. That was me responding to me, BTW. I was a bit hasty in asking for more info. TheRickles 22 hrs ago #15

I know BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago #16

They don't care...I know I'm snarky, but they don't. The only good news: LeftInTX 21 hrs ago #17

Alito would have found another lie to support his predetermined conclusion: honor 0: lie 1 Augiedog 21 hrs ago #18