Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Judge won't block New York City circumcision law [View all]eggplant
(4,139 posts)27. Boy, google is so hard to operate.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/27/health/aap-circumcision-recommendation/index.html
AAP: Health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks
Revising its policy on circumcision for the first time in 13 years, the American Academy of Pediatrics now says that the preventative health benefits of infant circumcision clearly outweigh the risks.
...
Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin, a small flap of skin that covers the tip of the penis, generally performed in the days after birth. Many Jews and Muslims circumcise their sons because of their religious beliefs. Other parents choose to snip for hygiene reasons, believing it's easier to keep a circumcised penis clean, or cosmetic ones, wanting junior to "look like dad."
...
However, an AAP task force formed in 2007 examined scientific studies conducted between 1995 through 2010 to evaluate if a revision was needed. The new, stronger language is a result of emerging evidence that found links between circumcision and decreased risk of urinary tract infections, some kinds of cancer, HPV, HIV, and other sexually transmitted diseases.
...
"The evidence was becoming clearer, and it's now obvious there's a preventative effect," says Dr. Michael Brady, chairman of the department of pediatrics at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, and a member of the AAP task force.
AAP: Health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks
Revising its policy on circumcision for the first time in 13 years, the American Academy of Pediatrics now says that the preventative health benefits of infant circumcision clearly outweigh the risks.
...
Circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin, a small flap of skin that covers the tip of the penis, generally performed in the days after birth. Many Jews and Muslims circumcise their sons because of their religious beliefs. Other parents choose to snip for hygiene reasons, believing it's easier to keep a circumcised penis clean, or cosmetic ones, wanting junior to "look like dad."
...
However, an AAP task force formed in 2007 examined scientific studies conducted between 1995 through 2010 to evaluate if a revision was needed. The new, stronger language is a result of emerging evidence that found links between circumcision and decreased risk of urinary tract infections, some kinds of cancer, HPV, HIV, and other sexually transmitted diseases.
...
"The evidence was becoming clearer, and it's now obvious there's a preventative effect," says Dr. Michael Brady, chairman of the department of pediatrics at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, and a member of the AAP task force.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The juries are a popularity contest - if you're popular you can say shit. If not, you get hidden. nt
riderinthestorm
Jan 2013
#54
Circumcision is a cosmetic procedure. So baby's wee wee looks like daddy's wee wee.
McCamy Taylor
Jan 2013
#45
Parents make all sorts of decisions that have real and permanent consequences for their kids.
eggplant
Jan 2013
#58
Discussions on DU are usually wide ranging, frequently OT, + you don't get to be the thread director
riderinthestorm
Jan 2013
#74
Oh yes. Its just more horrific added onto more horrific for me. Agreed. nt
riderinthestorm
Jan 2013
#114
Yes, it is so far fetched to imagine that there perverts posing as religious leaders.
pennylane100
Jan 2013
#19
One who wasn't aware of the details of the procedure and hires a mohel who uses this technique.
eggplant
Jan 2013
#10
Yes, it is politically motivated. For quite a while, the Peds said "No" to circumcision.
McCamy Taylor
Jan 2013
#44
For those who say circumcism prevents disease....prophylactic mastectomy of all women would prevent
McCamy Taylor
Jan 2013
#46
Imagine if the female "circumcism" was performed "medically" and sanctified by the Rabbi's
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#50
How are both gender genitals false equivalency? And breathtaking bigotry...please, proceed???
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#75
And it matters not which gender is experiencing the religious mouth or the knife...I think we are in
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#91
Thanks for keeping this kicked! I had a notice it did not comply with rules and link
SugarShack
Jan 2013
#71
Yes, the only points family and doctor could make for my infant son was it's basic procedure
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#93
There is no logical modern parsing of this issue of ritual male bloodletting other than hygiene.
libdem4life
Jan 2013
#79
Every single parent who consents to this needs their kids taken away. Period.
ButterflyBlood
Jan 2013
#96
The article is about 2 methods. NOWHERE is this about not doing one, just the method involved.
graham4anything
Jan 2013
#104
They clearly don't want to follow up on this. Lots of noise on marijuana in NY now....
SugarShack
Jan 2013
#106
If I were DA in NY EVER SINGLE mohel who's ever done this would get child molestation charges filed
ButterflyBlood
Jan 2013
#110
IMHO cut cocks are far better, but I don't see the need to do this on children
SWTORFanatic
Jan 2013
#111