Latest Breaking News

BadgerMom

(3,433 posts)

44. It might persuade some voters to vote differently in November.

Mon May 11, 2026, 12:08 AM

11 hrs ago

I’m sure Republicans would make his actions our fault somehow, but if a lot were released, it might quiet their uniform response.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Private Jack Smith remarks spur report he could drop 'unreleased evidence' against Trump [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Don't tease us... Funtatlaguy Yesterday #1

I Agree, Endless Teasing & Not Much Action WiVoter 23 hrs ago #18

He can't unilaterally decide to release the evidence InstantGratification 21 hrs ago #31

I believe the time is coming when an avalanche of previously withheld and/or hidden liberalla 21 hrs ago #33

I hope you're right. calimary 9 hrs ago #45

"...material that could prove damaging to the president." J_William_Ryan Yesterday #2

Why has this information NOT been released to the public already? Bluetus Yesterday #6

Much of it was sealed by Judge Cannon Nt Fiendish Thingy 21 hrs ago #35

She can't seal the world. Bluetus 16 hrs ago #40

She sealed his report Fiendish Thingy 15 hrs ago #41

It might persuade some voters to vote differently in November. BadgerMom 11 hrs ago #44

Bring it on, Jack Smith! Let's hear all of it ... unredacted FakeNoose Yesterday #3

Just think. relogic Yesterday #7

He needs a safety switch. multigraincracker 23 hrs ago #16

All that information popsdenver 23 hrs ago #21

Don't hold your breath, not goona happen. Btw, source is raw story. msfiddlestix 20 hrs ago #36

Not when it's published in the New York Times first ... Raw Story is reprinting the NYT story FakeNoose 20 hrs ago #37

Do it! sheshe2 Yesterday #4

If he has further evidence, he should release it. JohnnyRingo Yesterday #5

Mueller orangecrush Yesterday #8

Why wait????? The way to stop a predator is to strike first and hard. Ford_Prefect Yesterday #9

Don't think this is the man trump wants to mess with. republianmushroom 23 hrs ago #10

Ewwwww Just Jerome 23 hrs ago #20

Why not? The old one sin't working too good: 3Hotdogs 23 hrs ago #26

Why "private" is part of the title? What am I missing? question everything 23 hrs ago #11

He is a private individual now, no longer employed by the public/government. nt SunSeeker 23 hrs ago #13

The remarks were made in private? liberalla 23 hrs ago #25

A private event. Invited guests only I would surmise. AZ8theist 22 hrs ago #27

Mr. Smith should hire bodyguards Bayard 23 hrs ago #12

It's not just popsdenver 23 hrs ago #22

Is that a bone spur report? generalbetrayus 23 hrs ago #14

I've often wondered why Trump has not had to deal with leaks Nixie 23 hrs ago #15

He is insulated popsdenver 23 hrs ago #24

SOMEONE has to have some guts and get the truth out. johnnyplankton 23 hrs ago #17

I believe that Jack Smith has the integrity to do it FakeNoose 15 hrs ago #42

So why didn't he release it before the presidential election?? mucifer 23 hrs ago #19

He would have been breaking the law FakeNoose 15 hrs ago #43

If he's prosecuted for illegally investigating trump radical noodle 23 hrs ago #23

Jack Smith has something BAD on Donald. Joinfortmill 22 hrs ago #28

So he'll drop this stuff only to help himself? johnp3907 22 hrs ago #29

Just do it. Piecemeal it if you want but just get it out thete Deuxcents 22 hrs ago #30

At first I thought Jack Smith had enlisted in the army with the rank of Private Redleg 21 hrs ago #32

More Raw Story bullshit.... reACTIONary 21 hrs ago #34

MaddowBlog-Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump's 'corrupted' Justice Department LetMyPeopleVote 20 hrs ago #38

Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. 'Corrupted' by Trump and His Allies (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote 19 hrs ago #39

Jack Smith.... MarcoZandrini 2 hrs ago #46