Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

highplainsdem

(63,475 posts)
Wed Jun 10, 2026, 04:25 PM 21 hrs ago

Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google [View all]

Source: Ars Technica

Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google
Google AI Overview court loss in Germany could spell doom for AI search industry.

Ashley Belanger – Jun 10, 2026 12:19 PM

-snip-

Google tried the usual arguments to shield itself from liability for false statements in AI Overviews, such as arguing that most users understand that AI outputs aren't always accurate and must be verified.

But the court found that, unlike traditional search engines that merely present lists of links to third-party statements, Google's tool made "independent, new, and substantive statements" based on its own misinterpretation of links on the Internet.

That's a problem, the court said, because while publishers may have been able to sue to stop third parties from publishing defamatory statements appearing in Google search results, only Google can correct the underlying algorithm and outputs displayed in AI Overviews. And because, at least initially, the company did not, it therefore "must be held accountable," the court ruled. Beyond that, Google's argument was deemed particularly weak, since the AI overview in this case "contains statements that do not appear in the search results at all."

The court's order--requiring a temporary injunction barring Google from spreading the false claims in any further AI Overviews--may have global implications, as the court seems to be the first to hold an AI firm liable for AI speech.

-snip-

Read more: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/06/nobody-needs-ai-to-search-the-internet-court-says-in-ruling-against-google/



About time. More at the link. Note: this ruling was from a court in Germany.

The judge is absolutely correct that no one needs AI search summaries, and Google should be held liable for them.

The AI companies should never have been treated as if it was OK for their flawed genAI tools to provide wrong answers.
79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow, this is a great ruling. I hope it holds! SunSeeker 21 hrs ago #1
Outside of the issue of defamatory statements... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #2
You can find them useful. Doesn't change the fact that AI isn't necessary for the task, which these companies are all Karasu 20 hrs ago #4
Nobody is forcing users to use AI.... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #13
Um..yes, they are. "Scrolling down" doesn't change that. Companies forcing the use of AI goes MUCH farther than simple Karasu 19 hrs ago #17
Unless you check everything in the AI overview - every alleged fact, every quote, every source - you highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #5
It's not really that hard to check it out.... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #12
LOL! In other words, you don't check. And it sounds as if you'd use AI overviews you hadn't bothered highplainsdem 17 hrs ago #31
If you look at a page from a "regular" web page search, do you.... reACTIONary 17 hrs ago #34
I've seen news stories including studies about the links in AI overviews often not actually leading highplainsdem 17 hrs ago #36
I'm focused on the value AI brings to .... reACTIONary 14 hrs ago #50
AI search on the internet is a parasite killing its host. There's no value in that. The errors make its highplainsdem 14 hrs ago #51
Well then, if that's the case, eventually..... reACTIONary 14 hrs ago #52
Of all the silly comparisons. Calculators would never have been widely used if they were as error-prone highplainsdem 13 hrs ago #57
I sometimes post AI search results here, and.... reACTIONary 13 hrs ago #58
The whopper is everything you've said suggesting people should trust AI results. Even AI companies highplainsdem 13 hrs ago #61
Not any less trustful than "the internet" itself..... reACTIONary 3 hrs ago #67
Again, you're trusting AI summaries known to make mistakes. You're also choosing to use AI tools highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #69
Again, I've never accessed anything on the internet... reACTIONary 3 hrs ago #73
This message was self-deleted by its author Betty Boom 3 hrs ago #68
Thanks for your comments Betty Boom 3 hrs ago #71
You are welcome! Here on DU, even those who are a bit... reACTIONary 2 hrs ago #74
Unfortunately, I had quite an unpleasant experience to the contrary recently Betty Boom 2 hrs ago #75
The problem with AI overviews is that they're not reliable. ShazzieB 20 hrs ago #14
I think they are more reliable than some make them out to be.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #16
There are still whoppers aplenty. cab67 16 hrs ago #38
Plain search used to do that Cirsium 19 hrs ago #18
Your experience with "plain search" and with... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #19
it isn't a matter of opinion Cirsium 19 hrs ago #20
It seems to be a subjective judgement to me.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #23
OK Cirsium 18 hrs ago #30
Wow! Thanks.... reACTIONary 17 hrs ago #32
Thank you Cirsium 13 hrs ago #60
I sometimes find them amusing. cab67 16 hrs ago #37
And you just admitted you have to wade through irrelevant junk... paleotn 16 hrs ago #42
Then one has to verify that it's not inaccurate slop GenThePerservering 15 hrs ago #46
How can you be sure what the agenda of the AI programmer is? Like an algorithm, it can steer us in the direction Martin68 2 hrs ago #78
You make a very good point... reACTIONary 37 min ago #79
We were able to do it just fine (in fact, better) BEFORE this immensely destructive shit came along. Karasu 20 hrs ago #3
Yes. Search was much better before. highplainsdem 20 hrs ago #6
The quality of their searches declined significantly. hunter 18 hrs ago #27
AI "search" Be Leave On 20 hrs ago #7
Profitable, because we are a post-literate society. SouthBayDem 14 hrs ago #56
Fuck Google! caballojm 20 hrs ago #8
DuckDuckGo has an AI, but they actually allow you to completely turn it off, and they have a version of their site that Karasu 20 hrs ago #10
Same here. paleotn 16 hrs ago #43
Everyone getting those commercials claiming we need a million data centers Bengus81 20 hrs ago #9
Here's what's wrong with the massive data centers ... FakeNoose 5 hrs ago #65
Their wanting to put one up around Garden City,Ks and it's projected water use Bengus81 4 hrs ago #66
Yes many of these data centers are going up in rural areas, and lack of zoning laws is a big reason FakeNoose 2 hrs ago #76
Kick dalton99a 20 hrs ago #11
I want to know how Progressive dog 19 hrs ago #15
I have not seen contradictions, but I think vanlassie 19 hrs ago #22
I have seen something worse than a contradiction. pnwmom 19 hrs ago #24
Yea that's bad. I would never accept personal info vanlassie 18 hrs ago #28
You could find it just as easily with a 'precisely composed query' GenThePerservering 15 hrs ago #47
I've been a heavy user of the internet for many years. vanlassie 13 hrs ago #62
Even more reprehensible... GiqueCee 19 hrs ago #21
Yes. People need to realize that every single writer, visual artist, photographer, singer, musician, highplainsdem 16 hrs ago #44
Nailed it! GiqueCee 15 hrs ago #45
It's human nature to expect the biggest reward for the lowest cost. SouthBayDem 14 hrs ago #53
So the AI bros ripping off the world's intellectual property is just human nature? highplainsdem 13 hrs ago #59
Republicans will pass a law making it illegal to restrict AI search Bobstandard 19 hrs ago #25
'Almost Intelligence' trains from anything it can find (within reason, supposedly) 3825-87867 18 hrs ago #26
"Imitation Intelligence" is a good name. hunter 18 hrs ago #29
It's pretty easy to tell if Republicans are lying!--- Jack Valentino 17 hrs ago #33
I call it a fancy shorthand for Anti-Intellectualism. SouthBayDem 14 hrs ago #54
I wish this was here. Figarosmom 17 hrs ago #35
I probably don't ask complicated questions, but I find the Google AI helpful Bluetus 16 hrs ago #40
I've asked about current news events Figarosmom 16 hrs ago #41
That's an astute judge. But it goes beyond that. Bluetus 16 hrs ago #39
This is something a lot of people don't understand GenThePerservering 15 hrs ago #49
I heard a good explanation the other day Bluetus 3 hrs ago #72
very insightful. that's why hallucinations will never go away altogether. nt scipan 14 hrs ago #55
People still use Google? It's a spy agency that sells your data. I stopped ages ago. usonian 15 hrs ago #48
Type -ai at the end of your search and you'll find out how little you need AI Bengus81 6 hrs ago #63
AI regurgitates a lot of garbage and presents itself as fact. Historic NY 6 hrs ago #64
AI Chatbots reviewed by Behind the Bastards ihaveaquestion 3 hrs ago #70
Google is using AI in the same way that using an algorithm produces search results that benefit advertisers. Martin68 2 hrs ago #77
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nobody needs AI to search...