The jurist condemned “the Trump administration’s well-established history of using criminal investigations to retaliate” against Trump’s political foes.
Judge smacks down DOJ on subpoenas for Minnesota officials, including Walz and Frey.
The jurist condemned “the Trump administration’s well-established history of using criminal investigations to retaliate†against Trump’s political foes.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
— TheBlackPage (Woke, DEI forever against fascism) (@theblackpage.bsky.social) 2026-06-22T21:53:04.418Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/judge-smacks-down-doj-subpoenas-minnesota-walz-frey
But this wasn’t the only foray from Donald Trump’s Justice Department related to Minnesota. Politico reported:
A federal judge has thrown out Justice Department grand jury subpoenas aimed at Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and his allies, calling them an abusive and retaliatory process to punish Walz based on his refusal to assist President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.
In a blistering ruling, U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz said there was “no doubt” that the subpoenas were issued to damage Walz — part of what he said was a pattern of Trump administration efforts to use criminal process to punish the president’s adversaries.
“Initiating a criminal investigation in order to harass political opponents or to coerce them into taking official action — particularly official action that the federal government cannot directly require those political opponents to take — is a blatantly unlawful and unethical use the grand-jury process,” Schiltz, who was appointed by George W. Bush, wrote in a 29-page ruling unsealed Monday.....
A few days after the Journal’s report reached the public, the Justice Department opened an investigation into Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.
Evidently, the federal judge who just threw out DOJ grand jury subpoenas aimed at Minnesota officials took note of these relevant details.
Trump’s repeated vows of “retribution,” Schiltz wrote, “
establishes beyond reasonable dispute” that the grand jury subpoenas “were a part of a broader campaign to coerce state and local officials in Minnesota to assist the Trump administration in its enforcement of immigration laws.”
In case that weren’t quite enough, the jurist tied the subpoenas to what he called “
the Trump administration’s well-established history of using criminal investigations to retaliate against and pressure the President’s political and personal adversaries.”
Walz celebrated the decision as “a victory for the rule of law and our democracy,” which it most certainly was, notwithstanding the likely appeal.
= new reply since forum marked as read