Latest Breaking News

hlthe2b

(115,196 posts)

1. Uggh. Slotkin went on with Stephen A. Smith...

Reply to DrFunkenstein (Original post)

Fri Jun 26, 2026, 02:08 PM

13 hrs ago

Talk about BAD judgement. Uggh. I've liked Slotkin, but damn...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

dave99 Katinfl Scubamatt mamajudi johnp3907 rpannier Lemon Lyman

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Slotkin calls for 'new leadership' in the Democratic Party [View all] DrFunkenstein 13 hrs ago OP

Uggh. Slotkin went on with Stephen A. Smith... hlthe2b 13 hrs ago #1

We all know she is right. Many here have agreed that Chuckee is a wet noodle. Just about anyone else would do a Exp 12 hrs ago #8

Which was not my point... clearly never even mentioned that. It was the venue. hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #10

Doesn't matter if she's on Fox or PBS, she's telling it like it is. She's always had a good message so going on any Exp 12 hrs ago #13

Again, NOT MY POINT. Clearly you know nothing about Stephen A. Smith. Bye. Done. hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #14

He's the Af-Am sports guy who gets political. I too think he's an idiot. But that doesn't matter. eom Exp 12 hrs ago #15

Who gives a rat's bum about Smith? Obviously she got the message out. And she is 100% right. flashman13 9 hrs ago #31

I also think that Ken Martin has not been an effective leader for the DNC. Lonestarblue 12 hrs ago #12

Post removed Post removed 11 hrs ago #17

Good call Mig popsdenver 10 hrs ago #30

I can't stand him kimbutgar 11 hrs ago #18

Our elected representatives should not live in bubbles Soul_of_Wit 11 hrs ago #19

So, not the point. Slotkin can go on any program, but she should not give him the attention hlthe2b 10 hrs ago #20

I apparently touched a nerve Soul_of_Wit 10 hrs ago #23

As I said, you be you and continue your adoration for Smith. Most of us know better than hlthe2b 10 hrs ago #24

This is a gratuitously nasty and arrogant response Akakoji 10 hrs ago #25

What a "polite" thing to say... hlthe2b 10 hrs ago #26

I share . . . Scubamatt 10 hrs ago #22

I often have that sentiment on these issues re:inner workings of the party Raven123 6 hrs ago #36

Looks like someone was not included dave99 12 hrs ago #2

I wholeheartedly agree awesomerwb1 12 hrs ago #3

Oh, hey, old buddy. blm 12 hrs ago #4

blm!!!! DrFunkenstein 12 hrs ago #6

😘 blm 12 hrs ago #7

is she volunteering to be the new leadership? msongs 12 hrs ago #5

She's got a ways to go given her yes vote on the Laken Riley Act. LuvLoogie 12 hrs ago #9

...not volunteering so much as lobbying to be it. LudwigPastorius 3 hrs ago #40

Slotkin is awesome. She was brave as a brand new Rep in Congress to vote for impeaching TSF. That was a biggie Exp 12 hrs ago #11

I'm guessing she wants to be majority leader Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #16

Me too Katcat 10 hrs ago #21

Looking at the results of the *past decade* not the past 1-2 years, that's a "no shit" conclusion. RockRaven 10 hrs ago #27

Sorry To Inform You.... DAngelo136 10 hrs ago #28

Stephen A. Smith??? Cirsium 10 hrs ago #29

I agree Skittles 9 hrs ago #32

Power is hard to give up. Mark.b2 8 hrs ago #34

yeah, I know Skittles 5 hrs ago #39

"Strongly worded letters" didn't cut it Ponietz 9 hrs ago #33

Chuck and Hakeem beg to differ Charlie Chapulin 6 hrs ago #35

Why is this so fucking hard. Baitball Blogger 5 hrs ago #37

We don't cater to corporations creeksneakers2 37 min ago #44

It's simple Magoo48 5 hrs ago #38

She's right. I don't disagree. lees1975 3 hrs ago #41

Please explain how leaders such as Schumer and Jeffries are to blame Akakoji 1 hr ago #42

We need to concentrate on stopping Trump creeksneakers2 50 min ago #43