Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(2,183 posts)
34. Completely agree that unity has to go both ways.
Sun Jun 28, 2026, 06:30 AM
7 hrs ago

That is exactly why the timing and context of these debates matter so much. There is a huge difference between a primary debate and airing grievances on a national podcast right before a general election.

Part of building a winning coalition means understanding that what works in a safe blue seat won't always work in a tough competitive district. The party leadership's job is to protect our most vulnerable candidates in red and purple areas so we can actually win a majority. It isn't an attack on voters; it's just hard electoral math.

Internal factional debates are healthy in their proper venue, but when they are aired publicly at the eleventh hour, it only drains momentum from the entire ticket. We can debate leadership and strategy all we want once the gavels are secured, but we have to win the house first before we can remodel it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She is right we need new leadership! bob4460 22 hrs ago #1
The last thing we need now is to go to war with ourselves. creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #3
Comical at best luv2fly 15 hrs ago #11
What do you think I should call the people creeksneakers2 12 hrs ago #16
What I think you should call engaged voters is irrelevant. luv2fly 12 hrs ago #17
The choice was remarkably unwise. creeksneakers2 11 hrs ago #19
Roughly 33,000 people feel differently n/t luv2fly 11 hrs ago #22
In NYC creeksneakers2 11 hrs ago #24
They've been calling Dems communist for decades. Cobalt Violet 7 hrs ago #35
Post removed Post removed 1 hr ago #51
not true. Cobalt Violet 1 hr ago #53
How can you deny it? creeksneakers2 1 hr ago #54
She's one of the JustAnotherGen 6 hrs ago #40
Why? angrychair 2 hrs ago #50
Are they democrats? creeksneakers2 1 hr ago #52
Not sure I understand your question angrychair 1 hr ago #55
Its relevant to your complaint about my language. creeksneakers2 11 hrs ago #20
You prefer "progressive loonies," yeah we know n/t luv2fly 11 hrs ago #23
I'm backing off some because creeksneakers2 11 hrs ago #25
No she's Not! Look to herself for her votes for Cha 10 hrs ago #27
We really don't need this shit right now. I don't care, the stakes are too high to be doing the usual bickering Cheezoholic 22 hrs ago #2
Right on! creeksneakers2 22 hrs ago #4
Some people won't lead and they won't get out of the way Ponietz 22 hrs ago #6
You can't lead from the minority. QueerDuck 7 hrs ago #37
Mahalo! We sure as Hellscape Don't! Cha 10 hrs ago #28
Spot on from the CBC!!! Unforced public drama is the absolute last thing we need right now. QueerDuck 22 hrs ago #5
So is it projecting unity angrychair 19 hrs ago #8
There will be time for that later. creeksneakers2 11 hrs ago #21
Completely agree that unity has to go both ways. QueerDuck 7 hrs ago #34
My point is angrychair 3 hrs ago #43
Vote for every Democrat on your ballot in November. yardwork 3 hrs ago #48
Well... it seems clear that we are talking about two entirely different things. QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #49
"Spot on from the CBC!!! Unforced public drama is the absolute last thing we need right now". LiberalLovinLug 15 hrs ago #10
Not sure how disciplined campaign strategy qualifies as an oxymoron. QueerDuck 7 hrs ago #36
AIPAC, i.e., "Talking dollars" Ponietz 22 hrs ago #7
This is why Democrats lose elections... Escape 16 hrs ago #9
Work together. Makes a ton of sense to me. oasis 15 hrs ago #12
Yes it does.. I'm so disapponted in Sen Slotkin. Cha 10 hrs ago #30
Politicians gonna politic. yardwork 3 hrs ago #47
Yes! We've done it befoe so we know the Cha 10 hrs ago #29
Spot on. Those advocating for "purity tests" would rather rule the ashes of our minority than win a majority. QueerDuck 7 hrs ago #38
Vote for every Democrat on your ballot this fall. yardwork 3 hrs ago #46
I support a Black person Miguelito Loveless 14 hrs ago #13
Rep Crockett won't be there next year. I support Cha 10 hrs ago #31
Jasmine Crockett will no longer be in Congress as of January 2027 Wiz Imp 1 hr ago #56
I agree with the CBC. LudwigPastorius 14 hrs ago #14
Excellent post, Thanks! Cha 10 hrs ago #32
Debate all that Later! ffs w rhe squabbles right now! Win FIRST!!! And. .. electric_blue68 14 hrs ago #15
All of this. yardwork 3 hrs ago #45
Corraling Cats dave99 11 hrs ago #18
Hmm... Sen Slotkin should take the CDC's advice! Cha 10 hrs ago #26
The party is going to have this discussion at some point regardless fujiyamasan 8 hrs ago #33
Of course Icanthinkformyself 6 hrs ago #39
Slotkin is one of the most JustAnotherGen 6 hrs ago #41
To underscore the issue regarding Slotkin BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago #42
Right. She's labeled on at least one website chart as a "Swing" voter with Dems; whereas the Democratic Socialist ancianita 20 min ago #59
Vote for every Democrat on your ballot this fall. yardwork 3 hrs ago #44
Slotkin should have defined "Democratic leadership" and "old models." She will confuse independent voters. ancianita 40 min ago #57
Jeffries has been a tremendous leader of the House Quiet Em 37 min ago #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CBC pushes back on Slotki...»Reply #34