Latest Breaking News

onenote

(46,369 posts)

14. Supreme Court Rule 44allows the losing party to petition for reconsideration

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #3)

Wed Jul 1, 2026, 08:29 AM

Yesterday

The petition must be filed within 25 days and can only be granted if supported by one of the justices who supported the decision to which the reconsideration petition is directed. Consequently such petitions almost never are granted.

So, while the losing parties in Dobbs and the immunity case (not”we”) could have filed a reconsideration petition they didn’t because they knew it wouldn’t have been granted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate IbogaProject muriel_volestrangler Wednesdays Prof. Toru Tanaka justhanginon

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawyer for E. Jean Carroll says Trump wants to delay $5 million payment in sex abuse, defamation case [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

;-{) MEAN E. JEAN Goonch Yesterday #1

jesus he has some nerve. rampartd Yesterday #2

I keep bdamomma Yesterday #12

Typical rapist mentality Gaytano70 Yesterday #16

He pays NOW 31st Street Bridge Yesterday #31

justice has been for sale for longer than 250 years. rampartd Yesterday #47

If I recall . . . moreland01 23 hrs ago #54

So if Trump thinks he can ask the Supreme Court to reconsider their decisions, can everyone do that? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #3

Supreme Court Rule 44allows the losing party to petition for reconsideration onenote Yesterday #14

He's going to wait until the 25th day melm00se Yesterday #29

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Yesterday #33

But the agreement with the escrow account nullifies that tactic Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #38

Until the motion for a stay melm00se 21 hrs ago #57

My understanding is the escrow agreement waives his right to appeal further Fiendish Thingy 20 hrs ago #58

The appellate bond melm00se 20 hrs ago #59

And if the judge refuses to grant a stay? Nt Fiendish Thingy 20 hrs ago #60

Judge Kaplan has granted Carroll's request for an expedited schedule for deciding her motion seeking disbursement onenote 19 hrs ago #62

Put a lien on either Bedminster or Mar-A-Lago. no_hypocrisy Yesterday #4

The money is actually already set aside in an escrow account controlled by the courts BumRushDaShow Yesterday #5

Thanks, didn't know that. no_hypocrisy Yesterday #7

You are correct Pototan Yesterday #13

Plus the interest? n/t returnee Yesterday #44

Domesticating a judgment, melm00se Yesterday #36

dumb question - cab67 Yesterday #39

Predator in the Administration. rubbersole Yesterday #46

Long-standing abbreviation for Pain In The Ass Talitha Yesterday #50

Pain in the.... melm00se 21 hrs ago #56

lock up this predator Blues Heron Yesterday #6

I second your motion................ turbinetree Yesterday #32

She should sue yet again for emotional distress. Chasstev365 Yesterday #8

He just cannot take "no" for an answer. MLWR Yesterday #9

Like a rapist. Gaytano70 Yesterday #17

Donny has the money he has taken $1.2 billion in crypto scams alone since taking office Botany Yesterday #10

the money is in escrow, controled by the court Pototan Yesterday #15

And when he appealed the last time they nailed them with I think $7M more Bengus81 Yesterday #21

I wonder about the additional $80 million fine he got because he just couldn't keep his mouth shut after the Botany Yesterday #23

That is a separate case and is still pending BumRushDaShow Yesterday #25

Gawd...how long can that POS drag that one out? It happened almost Bengus81 Yesterday #27

It's not the money so much as the fact that the judgment is irrevocably final. Ocelot II Yesterday #35

The Trump family motto: Calcitrare Vasculum de Via* tanyev Yesterday #11

I think maybe... GiqueCee Yesterday #20

Hate to say it, but our Supreme Court has this SAME attitude on everything involving bluestarone Yesterday #40

thats all he does ,delay, telay. out spend and hopes u croak AllaN01Bear Yesterday #18

You can appeal a SC ruling?? Bengus81 Yesterday #19

You can ask for a reconsideration, which you won't get. Ocelot II Yesterday #28

I hope they tell him hell fucking no TODAY. But...it will be another LOSS for Trump Bengus81 Yesterday #30

Your probably right, BUT a DELAY is what he's wanting. bluestarone Yesterday #41

Of course. It totally burns his ass that he has to pay that money. Ocelot II Yesterday #42

we wouldn't get "reconsideration". rampartd Yesterday #48

she should put a lien on his property and foreclose moonshinegnomie Yesterday #22

"Carroll does not consent." Again. 2MuchNoise Yesterday #24

What's the big deal? All he has to do is sell a couple of pardons Ocelot II Yesterday #26

positive thinkers never admit to a loss. rampartd Yesterday #49

If she passes away, does the money go to her Estate? hamsterjill Yesterday #34

The money is already in an escrow account, IIRC Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #37

I seriously doubt that she will ever get any of the money... Escape Yesterday #43

Irony is angrychair Yesterday #45

Trump never pays. Turbineguy Yesterday #51

But he paid out (IIRC) 25 million when he lost the Dump University case. Talitha 23 hrs ago #52

The nut has been kicked in the nuts. Don't stop. twodogsbarking 23 hrs ago #53

Damn good lawyer. Not the scum trump lives with. dave99 21 hrs ago #55

It will just kill him to pay her a dime dlk 20 hrs ago #61

He knows payment is guilt. Old Crank 18 hrs ago #63

He's enriched himself to the tune of $2.2 billion since January 2025 BeneteauBum 15 hrs ago #64

Pay the lady Cadfael 14 hrs ago #65

He'll just have someone else pay. The Grand Illuminist 14 hrs ago #66

Deadline Legal Blog-'Time for him to pay': E. Jean Carroll moves to collect after Trump's SCOTUS rejection LetMyPeopleVote 1 hr ago #67