Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

alp227

(33,284 posts)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 05:03 PM Jan 2012

Justice Dept. takes on itself in probe of 2001 anthrax attacks [View all]

Since it began a decade ago, the federal government’s massive investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks has been plagued by missteps and complications.

Investigators initially focused on the wrong man, then had to pay him a nearly $6 million settlement. In 2008, they accused another man, Bruce E. Ivins, who killed himself before he could go to trial.

Now, in the latest twist, the government has argued against itself.

In documents deep in the files of a recently settled Florida lawsuit, Justice Department civil attorneys contradicted their own department’s conclusion that Ivins was unquestionably the anthrax killer. The lawyers said the type of anthrax in Ivins’s lab was “radically different” from the deadly anthrax. They cited several witnesses who said Ivins was innocent, and they suggested that a private laboratory in Ohio could have been involved in the attacks.

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/justice-dept-takes-on-itself-in-probe-of-2001-anthrax-attacks/2012/01/05/gIQAhGLlVQ_singlePage.html

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mr Obama appears to have decided to take the gloves off with the BFEE. nt bemildred Jan 2012 #1
It looks more like the civil division was trying to minimize any pay out EFerrari Jan 2012 #15
I haven't followed that much, so I'll defer to you there. bemildred Jan 2012 #18
Well, imo, it's safer to point to all the evidence that says the stuff couldn't be produced EFerrari Jan 2012 #20
I'm OK with that. bemildred Jan 2012 #21
To be honest, if he did take this on, I would be frightened for him. EFerrari Jan 2012 #23
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #2
fingers crossed. . . n/t annabanana Jan 2012 #3
good to see people aren't giving up on this issue renegade000 Jan 2012 #4
George W. Bush failed to protect America from terrorism after the 9/11 attacks jpak Jan 2012 #5
Why would Ivins send this to the Sun and the National Enquirer? JDPriestly Jan 2012 #6
Good point. Ivins didn't seem to love Bush. nt mistertrickster Jan 2012 #14
And why would someone as knowledgeable as Ivins EFerrari Jan 2012 #17
Where'd I put that popcorn? 99th_Monkey Jan 2012 #7
So . . . what's going to happen? gratuitous Jan 2012 #8
Misleading to say suicide 'cause they were closing in on him bjobotts Jan 2012 #9
Yep. Not to mention subborning perjury EFerrari Jan 2012 #16
Battelle. The trail leads back to Battelle, and that leads straight to bushco. yardwork Jan 2012 #10
Hmm, Ohio, there's always dirty and toxic crap in Ohio Dont call me Shirley Jan 2012 #11
Ohio. patrice Jan 2012 #12
Just like "regulatory capture" we need to face the probability of "legal capture". nt patrice Jan 2012 #13
US Patent 6316000 6387665. Anthrax vaccine westerebus Jan 2012 #19
... Solly Mack Jan 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Dept. takes on it...