Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: TIME magazine reveals its Person of the Year 2011 [View all]On the Road
(20,783 posts)That's kind of the point.
OWS has been almost 100% pacificist. Martin Luther King or Mohandas Ghandi would be more appropriate faces of the movement. Instead, a lot of people are using the image of a violent terrorist, whether the character or the historical figure is intended.
I understand the argument about Hollywood violence vs real violence, but I just don't buy it in this case. If you're protesting, you're protesting in front of the world. Personal symbols have to give way to public perception, or the cause is undermined. One of the reasons "V for Vendetta" didn't inspire me like it did a lot of other people is precisely because of the casual attitude towards violence.
It's very strange to me. It's like the civil rights movement championing John Brown.