Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ellisonz

(27,776 posts)
5. Nope.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:24 PM
Jan 2012
On June 21, 2011, Kelly announced that he would be leaving NASA's astronaut corps and the U.S. Navy effective October 1. He cited the needs of his wife during her recovery as a reason for his retirement.[1] Kelly and Giffords announced plans for a joint memoir which would include a discussion of the Tucson shooting. The book was released by Scribner in November 2011.[45][46] Kelly's retirement has raised speculation that he might run for office in 2012 either for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Senator Jon Kyl who is retiring, or for his wife's seat in the U.S. House of Representatives if her health condition prevents her from running for re-election. Kelly says he is not running for office but he also has not ruled out the possibility.[47]

He plans to make public speaking appearances after his retirement. Kelly says that he will discuss his career as an astronaut and share his and Giffords's "story with audiences in a way that will allow healing and strength to emerge from a tragic event, and to remind everyone about the resiliency of the human spirit."[48]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Kelly_%28astronaut%29#U2

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

that wouldn't make any sense JI7 Jan 2012 #1
Isn't he still on active duty? nt MADem Jan 2012 #2
Nope. ellisonz Jan 2012 #5
Thanks! nt MADem Jan 2012 #6
Is the seat safe or compeditive? craigmatic Jan 2012 #3
Competative. ellisonz Jan 2012 #4
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mark Kelly not running fo...»Reply #5