Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama: Entitlements ‘Do Not Make Us A Nation Of Takers’ [View all]meow2u3
(25,250 posts)3. I love the subtle digs he took at the Randians and teabaggers
Last edited Mon Jan 21, 2013, 03:14 PM - Edit history (1)
We, the people, still believe that every citizen deserves a basic measure of security and dignity. We must make the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit. But we reject the belief that America must choose between caring for the generation that built this country and investing in the generation that will build its future. For we remember the lessons of our past, when twilight years were spent in poverty, and parents of a child with a disability had nowhere to turn. We do not believe that in this country, freedom is reserved for the lucky, or happiness for the few. We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, any one of us, at any time, may face a job loss, or a sudden illness, or a home swept away in a terrible storm. The commitments we make to each other through Medicare, and Medicaid, and Social Security these things do not sap our initiative; they strengthen us. They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great.
Take that, Paul Ryan and your fellow Rand cultists!
And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity; human dignity and justice.
Suck it, teabaggers!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Exactly. They are ENTITLEMENTS and we should not let repubs turn it into a dirty word like they did
pampango
Jan 2013
#24
Trying to avoid the wrath of the RW by hiding is what it is. That doesn't work.
freshwest
Jan 2013
#41
How sad a sign of our times to see our First Lady apparently wearing body armor.
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#6
And a great speech, the most inclusive ever! I am proud of him and the ideals we believe in.
freshwest
Jan 2013
#31
Thanks. The RW won't respect the 47% more just because we change the word to please them.
freshwest
Jan 2013
#42
Why not? It's time to stop surrendering the entitled-to-rule GOP copyright on a word
freshwest
Jan 2013
#17
The GOP has hammered on the word liberal for as long as I can remember. But today
Politicub
Jan 2013
#32
But then, David Plouffe announced that "entitlement reform" is on Obama's agenda.
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#18