Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DallasNE

(8,009 posts)
2. An Emergency Response Plan Needs To Be Part Of The Approval Process
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 05:41 PM
Jan 2013

And not an afterthought after construction begins. Otherwise there is no leverage to have a plan with teeth. "Trust me" is not good enough. Not by a long shot.

A leak, depending on the location, could put the drinking water at risk in cities like Sioux City, Omaha, Lincoln and Kansas City in addition to a lot of other smaller communities. I don't think Gov. Heineman has done a very good job of looking after the citizens of his State (I reside in Omaha) by giving TransCanada a blank check on the emergency response plan.

I have always thought that the route should have stayed north and east of the Missouri river and followed ridges rather than river valley's where spills are instantly in major streams and threaten drinking water. It also seems to me that TransCanada should be required to carry super-cat insurance to cover costs of large spills.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nebraska Governor Approve...»Reply #2