Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Shafia trial jurors find family guilty of 1st-degree murder [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)34. Idea of Shafia deaths as 'honour killings' stirs debate
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20120130/shafia-trial-reaction-120130/
And if you read the comments on any online article at any media site, you will find that it doesn't take much to stir those sentiments, and for the foul-mouthed bigots who hold them to smear them around cyberspace.
... At issue is the Crown's argument that the deaths were "honour killings," murders intended to restore family dignity after the women's perceived rebellious behaviour.
... The weight of these words, however, has concerned many that this interpretation of the Shafia deaths will only further marginalize a community that is still enduring hateful sentiment related to the 9-11 terrorist attacks.
... Shortly after the Shafia women were found dead, Canada's justice department commissioned a report on so-called "honour killings" across the country.
As well, the report said the idea of killing for honour provides lawyers with a specific legal argument. By definition, the phrase implies that the crime has been planned within a family (often with a meeting) and the perpetrators don't feel or receive any negative stigma for the actions within their own communities.
Such a detailed definition, the report noted, could help protect victims when crimes like these go to court. Still, the research found that several cultural communities are concerned that the phrase "honour killing" will stir anti-immigration sentiment.
... The weight of these words, however, has concerned many that this interpretation of the Shafia deaths will only further marginalize a community that is still enduring hateful sentiment related to the 9-11 terrorist attacks.
... Shortly after the Shafia women were found dead, Canada's justice department commissioned a report on so-called "honour killings" across the country.
As well, the report said the idea of killing for honour provides lawyers with a specific legal argument. By definition, the phrase implies that the crime has been planned within a family (often with a meeting) and the perpetrators don't feel or receive any negative stigma for the actions within their own communities.
Such a detailed definition, the report noted, could help protect victims when crimes like these go to court. Still, the research found that several cultural communities are concerned that the phrase "honour killing" will stir anti-immigration sentiment.
And if you read the comments on any online article at any media site, you will find that it doesn't take much to stir those sentiments, and for the foul-mouthed bigots who hold them to smear them around cyberspace.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wonder how those SOBs would feel about a little Eye For An Eye justice, since they're so into their
MADem
Jan 2012
#6
AS I said a bit downthread, the son will be in his mid forties when he's up for parole.
MADem
Jan 2012
#10
So, the son will be in his mid forties when he might be unleashed upon the unsuspecting public.
MADem
Jan 2012
#9
Well, he beat the chair thanks to a law change, and he's south of the Canadian border, too.
MADem
Jan 2012
#15
The judge who sat through all of the trial and testimony called it an honour killing.
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#43
You can semantically parse the judges words all you like but the meaning is plain
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#53
Uh huh, that's fine. I've no desire to run for anything and will continue to work with abused women
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#55
You have an agenda and purposefully left out the rest of the judge's quote.
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#49