Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/freddie-mac-betting-against-homeowners-latest-gse-outrage-164015828.html
NPR and ProPublica released an explosive report http://www.npr.org/2012/01/30/145995636/freddie-mac-betting-against-struggling-homeowners Monday that found government-owned mortgage giant Freddie Mac betting against the very homeowners it is supposed to help. According to the news article, the investment division of Freddie Mac (or as Henry calls it, Freddie's "gambling desk"
placed billions of dollars of bets against homeowners who were trying to refinance their mortgages at lower rates.
According to NPR/ProPublica's review of public documents, Freddie Mac invested in securities called "inverse floaters," which receive all the interest payments from specified mortgage-backed securities. "If lots of people 'pre-pay' their old loans and refinance into new, cheaper ones, then Freddie Mac starts to lose money," ProPublica's Jesse Eisinger and NPR's Chris Arnold explain. "If people can't refinance, then Freddie wins because it continues to receive that flow of older, higher interest payments."
Although Freddie Mac's bets are legal, they're highly offensive. Rightly or not, many Americans blame Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae -- which was not mentioned in the NPR/ProPublica report -- for the housing boom and subsequent bust. Nearly all Americans would agree these companies should not be focused on generating profits, now that they are officially wards of the state and are using taxpayer dollars to make these bets, as Aaron and Henry discuss in the accompanying video.
Freddie Mac plays a significant role in determining mortgage rates and is one of the "gatekeepers" with the power to decide whether a homeowner can refinance at a lower rate. If homeowners can reduce their mortgage payments, then Freddie Mac loses money. Hence the conflict of interest and the concern Freddie has been turning down refi requests in order to benefit its proprietary trades.
snip
------------------------------------
When is enough financial rape enough for the average American?
NPR and ProPublica released an explosive report http://www.npr.org/2012/01/30/145995636/freddie-mac-betting-against-struggling-homeowners Monday that found government-owned mortgage giant Freddie Mac betting against the very homeowners it is supposed to help. According to the news article, the investment division of Freddie Mac (or as Henry calls it, Freddie's "gambling desk"
placed billions of dollars of bets against homeowners who were trying to refinance their mortgages at lower rates.
According to NPR/ProPublica's review of public documents, Freddie Mac invested in securities called "inverse floaters," which receive all the interest payments from specified mortgage-backed securities. "If lots of people 'pre-pay' their old loans and refinance into new, cheaper ones, then Freddie Mac starts to lose money," ProPublica's Jesse Eisinger and NPR's Chris Arnold explain. "If people can't refinance, then Freddie wins because it continues to receive that flow of older, higher interest payments."
Although Freddie Mac's bets are legal, they're highly offensive. Rightly or not, many Americans blame Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae -- which was not mentioned in the NPR/ProPublica report -- for the housing boom and subsequent bust. Nearly all Americans would agree these companies should not be focused on generating profits, now that they are officially wards of the state and are using taxpayer dollars to make these bets, as Aaron and Henry discuss in the accompanying video.
Freddie Mac plays a significant role in determining mortgage rates and is one of the "gatekeepers" with the power to decide whether a homeowner can refinance at a lower rate. If homeowners can reduce their mortgage payments, then Freddie Mac loses money. Hence the conflict of interest and the concern Freddie has been turning down refi requests in order to benefit its proprietary trades.
snip
------------------------------------
When is enough financial rape enough for the average American?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read