Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Shafia trial jurors find family guilty of 1st-degree murder [View all]and I was just about to edit my post again to point that out.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/story/2012/01/30/wdr-windsor-muslim-women-react-shafia.html
The judge called the crime cold-blooded and shameful. He said it is difficult to conceive of anything more heinous, more despicable or more honourless.
"It's really sad to hear that these thing exists during this day and time," said Issa, a Muslim woman from Somalia who moved to Canada 19 years ago. "My concern is that this is an act of violence against women, regardless of what you call it. Whether you call it an honour killing or a crime of passion, it's just wrong and it's unacceptable, and it's about time we put an end to this kind of practice."
... "I'm not saying that honour killing is a tradition, but I'm saying that patriarchal structure is definitely something that they hold on to," <Reema Khan from Pakistan> said. "In the case of this family, when they came to Canada, and the daughters were beginning to integrate into behaviour that was not acceptable <to their family>, it was a threat to the patriarchal structure of the family."
Khan said the term "honour killing" makes the killings more exotic or foreign.
"Essentially, honour killing is just violence against women. That's the core of what we need to address," she said.
... "I'm not saying that honour killing is a tradition, but I'm saying that patriarchal structure is definitely something that they hold on to," <Reema Khan from Pakistan> said. "In the case of this family, when they came to Canada, and the daughters were beginning to integrate into behaviour that was not acceptable <to their family>, it was a threat to the patriarchal structure of the family."
Khan said the term "honour killing" makes the killings more exotic or foreign.
"Essentially, honour killing is just violence against women. That's the core of what we need to address," she said.
html fixed
EDIT IN RESPONSE TO THE REPLY BELOW:
THE PASSAGE OF THE JUDGE'S WORDS WERE THE ONLY REFERENCE TO THE JUDGMENT IN THIS ARTICLE. NOTHING ELSE WAS QUOTED IN IT.
I DID NOT LEAVE ANYTHING OUT, "PURPOSEFULLY" OR OTHERWISE, BECAUSE THERE WAS NOTHING ELSE THERE.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wonder how those SOBs would feel about a little Eye For An Eye justice, since they're so into their
MADem
Jan 2012
#6
AS I said a bit downthread, the son will be in his mid forties when he's up for parole.
MADem
Jan 2012
#10
So, the son will be in his mid forties when he might be unleashed upon the unsuspecting public.
MADem
Jan 2012
#9
Well, he beat the chair thanks to a law change, and he's south of the Canadian border, too.
MADem
Jan 2012
#15
The judge who sat through all of the trial and testimony called it an honour killing.
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#43
You can semantically parse the judges words all you like but the meaning is plain
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#53
Uh huh, that's fine. I've no desire to run for anything and will continue to work with abused women
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#55
You have an agenda and purposefully left out the rest of the judge's quote.
riderinthestorm
Jan 2012
#49