Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 04:40 PM Feb 2013

Colorado Democrats Pass Bold New Gun Control Measures In House Committee [View all]

Source: Huffington Post

After a full day Tuesday of listening to testimony from gun control advocates and opponents, Colorado Democrats passed two bold new bills aimed at curbing gun violence in a state that has the dubious distinction of being the home to two of the bloodiest mass shootings in American history -- Columbine and Aurora.

First, the House Judiciary Committee passed House Bill 1229, on a 7 to 4 party line vote, which requires universal background checks on all private gun sales in Colorado.

Then, late Tuesday night, the committee passed a bill that bans the sale of high capacity gun magazines that hold more than 15 rounds or more than five shotgun shells. A person who already owns a high-capacity magazine fitting the description would be able to continue to own the magazine but would have to maintain continuous possession of it. Late Tuesday, HP-1224 was amended to increase the amount of rounds in a magazine to 15, instad of 10, and was also passed on a party line vote of 7 to 4. Both bills now head to the House floor for another vote.

Rep. Rhonda Fields (D-Aurora) was a sponsor on both pieces of legislation and was not pleased with the amendment which added an additional five rounds to the maximum capacity of a gun magazine. "Many of those people are critically injured for life because of their wounds," The Denver Post reports that Field said. "These high-capacity magazines allow a gun to fire large amounts of bullets to kill people as fast as possible."

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/13/ban-on-high-capacity-maga_n_2670463.html

55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hmmm Crepuscular Feb 2013 #1
+100000000000000000000 Light House Feb 2013 #2
Taping together magazines? Bad idea. riqster Feb 2013 #11
It's pretty common with rifle magazines NickB79 Feb 2013 #49
Risky, though. riqster Feb 2013 #51
hogwash.. frylock Feb 2013 #20
and of course, you speak from experience pasto76 Feb 2013 #40
thank you. no military experience on my end.. frylock Feb 2013 #41
A long journey to take indeed, but these small steps are getting us on our way... LanternWaste Feb 2013 #3
Yep. Gun nuts claim these actions are meaningless. But they know... onehandle Feb 2013 #5
Just like that 1994 AWB crowbar ... oh wait. hack89 Feb 2013 #12
And just like that wave in FEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS... derby378 Feb 2013 #18
On our way to what? Deep13 Feb 2013 #13
where did you get that this legislation is "disarming civilians?" frylock Feb 2013 #22
I wasn't talking to you. nt Deep13 Feb 2013 #42
well i'm talking to you on this public forum.. frylock Feb 2013 #44
If people are going to make LanternWaste Feb 2013 #52
Even the smallest steps forward etherealtruth Feb 2013 #39
Once again I heard a collective conservative head explosion meadowlark5 Feb 2013 #4
I wouldn't get too cocky Samjm Feb 2013 #9
Oh, I fully expect that has already started happening meadowlark5 Feb 2013 #31
I doubt this will pass anyway. Dr_Scholl Feb 2013 #48
Expect to lose Colorado in the next election. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #6
That's pre-12/14 thinking. onehandle Feb 2013 #7
Do you live in Colorado? I do. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #8
I live in Colorado too. backscatter712 Feb 2013 #16
I happen to agree with the restrictions Samjm Feb 2013 #17
I'm opposed and I vote Democratic. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #19
A magazine cap is a back-door "assault weapons" ban derby378 Feb 2013 #26
I do, and I think you are wrong. Hard Assets Feb 2013 #53
If you're in CO, Samjm Feb 2013 #15
Do you need machine guns or automatic guns in the rural area? Hard Assets Feb 2013 #54
We should let Republicans play the "9/11 card" derby378 Feb 2013 #23
oh noes!!1 frylock Feb 2013 #24
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #28
Colorado Dems are doing what their constituents want. joshcryer Feb 2013 #32
Guns Over People otohara Feb 2013 #46
Does "bold" mean sensible? Deep13 Feb 2013 #10
They are overreaching. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #14
Boulder Had ZERO Murders Last Year otohara Feb 2013 #21
And Boulder has the same laws that city I live in has. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #27
300 Miles Away & Fewer People otohara Feb 2013 #35
There's a reason Boulder has very few homicides. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #36
What's The Reason? otohara Feb 2013 #37
High income, low poverty college town. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #38
yeh, because a 15 rd limit is overreaching.. frylock Feb 2013 #25
Maybe not to you, but to other people it is. Ashgrey77 Feb 2013 #29
you don't know fuckall about me.. frylock Feb 2013 #30
No they have not guaranteed a damn thing Hard Assets Feb 2013 #55
Except that it doesn't Crepuscular Feb 2013 #33
The funny thing is... Deep13 Feb 2013 #43
As I've said before Crepuscular Feb 2013 #47
K&R If only Congress would follow suit and repeal the 2nd Amendment altogether rachel1 Feb 2013 #34
They can't. Llewlladdwr Feb 2013 #45
This is a "bold" gun control measure? NickB79 Feb 2013 #50
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Colorado Democrats Pass B...