Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
16. You are correct, but not complete.
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 10:38 PM
Feb 2013

The ISS is still in low Earth orbit. We have no heavy lift booster and only Russia has anything near it in capacity. There is no Saturn V today. It took the better part of a decade to build it in a well-funded era, if you stretch it a bit. The damned thing was fucking 30-some stories tall, almost all of which was dedicated to just getting the fucker out of the Earth's gravity well and launching it to the moon. Blasting off the moon, with no atmosphere and 1/6 Earth's gravity, is easy-peasey compared to getting to Mars, let alone landing and returning.

Mars does not have sufficient atmosphere to allow an Apollo-like landing. It has too much atmosphere, and twice the gravity, to allow a moon-like landing.

Russia has a particularly bad record of attempting a Mars landing. The US record has its failures as well. It isn't like landing on the moon. It's really fucking difficult.

I want people on Mars more than anybody, but we aren't even close to solving the issues to doing such and getting people back alive, let alone leaving them there to deal with things as they are with no rescue other than putative future supply ships.

Mars is a real bitch! I don't think we have the technology to do this by 2018, let alone the next decade. But a Manhattan Project could maybe do it. No hope for that at this time.

Shit! Over half the US thinks the world is less than 10,000 years old! How are you going to sell them on the necessity of space exploration. Fuck! They think Adam and Eve rode vegan velociraptors and Tyrannosaurs.

Not gonna happen without an extreme cultural change. And I am not sure I want such a drastic break. I would prefer something more gentle, and peaceful.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Going to Mars is a very tough task. longship Feb 2013 #1
Taber MacCallum and Jane Poynter spent two years in Biosphere 2 bananas Feb 2013 #4
Well, I am not so impressed with biosphere. longship Feb 2013 #7
As mentioned downthread, they probably won't land bananas Feb 2013 #15
You are correct, but not complete. longship Feb 2013 #16
Don't need a Saturn V bananas Feb 2013 #24
I love the Lagrangian point solutions! longship Feb 2013 #25
More details have emerged - 2 person flyby bananas Feb 2013 #27
I guess they are planning to do it like the early Polar Expeditions. Hugin Feb 2013 #38
Actually... oNobodyo Feb 2013 #10
Except that the US does not have a heavy lift booster. longship Feb 2013 #12
Ahem... oNobodyo Feb 2013 #19
Good. Good!! longship Feb 2013 #20
The reason why... oNobodyo Feb 2013 #22
But the Saturn V is four decades old. longship Feb 2013 #23
I agree with pre-supplied... Volaris Feb 2013 #46
"robotics to set up shelter" is not something that's been available for 20 years muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #17
yeap... oNobodyo Feb 2013 #21
Solar sails and electric propulsion have never carried anything as large as a human capsule muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #26
Sounds like the people wouldn't land muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #2
They probably won't land on Mars, they might dock with Phobos or Deimos bananas Feb 2013 #5
More details have emerged - 2 person flyby bananas Feb 2013 #28
A fly-by would mean there's relatively little to do at Mars muriel_volestrangler Feb 2013 #29
Where do I sign up???????????? greiner3 Feb 2013 #3
I did manage five on a mission long ways back. dipsydoodle Feb 2013 #6
Shit. Just my booze allowance means no one else eats...... cliffordu Feb 2013 #8
It ain't gonna happen in the next five years. struggle4progress Feb 2013 #9
So do they get land rights like the pioneers? They'll privatize Mars now. YOHABLO Feb 2013 #11
In the future, Mars will most likely be the first terraforming project derby378 Feb 2013 #13
That was the theme of Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy LongTomH Feb 2013 #31
I may have to check those books out derby378 Feb 2013 #32
Unless they can rig up a magnetosphere for either planet it's pointless. Bucky Feb 2013 #43
For that, you'll either need an active planetary core or a STAR WARS-type magnetic field derby378 Feb 2013 #45
Do a columbus and plant your flag claiming the planet for your company rustydog Feb 2013 #30
Not a bad incentive. Maybe the UN could put down rules. Bucky Feb 2013 #36
Some kind of 'global government' will be needed to set rules if we do start colonizing other pampango Feb 2013 #40
The more I think about it, the more I expect the UN not to be involved in such a process. Bucky Feb 2013 #41
There's justified optimism skepticscott Feb 2013 #14
Well, if you throw enough money at a problem... randome Feb 2013 #18
Tito Jackson? undeterred Feb 2013 #33
Never happen in five years daleo Feb 2013 #34
"Space for this event is limited." Bucky Feb 2013 #35
So very cool trip to Mars, though I wish they would set-up on the floor of our Oceans first. Sunlei Feb 2013 #37
I'll say it again... It's time to Man-up and send a Chimp! Hugin Feb 2013 #39
There's a country in North Africa where a bunch of people would like to send their President to Mars slackmaster Feb 2013 #42
rofl! bananas Feb 2013 #44
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dennis Tito To Announce P...»Reply #16