Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
31. The problem is that people testifying, even under oath,
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:24 AM
Feb 2013

have later been found out to have lied, usually with little consequence. Jail house snitches have the most incentive to lie, as they always have.

For example, in this case, who was the guy who testified about being offered money to kill Savio? What is his background?

While it may seem (and may actually be) a cut and dried issue in this case, it is a very disturbing precedent to have the legislature directly interfere in a criminal investigation and trial by rushing through a law designed specifically to aid the prosecution of one person.

This law stacks the deck yet again against defendants and will be abused to ensure conviction, quite probably of innocent people.

The admissibility of the hearsay testimony hinges on proving a witness was killed to prevent their testimony, but this creates a completely different standard of evidence for that crime, one much lower than the usual requirements (a jury trial, discovery, etc). In this case, if I understand correctly, the court has found that Savio was killed to prevent her testifying, yet her husband has not been charged with the crime, nor has anyone else.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hey Drew chuckstevens Feb 2013 #1
Judge Edward Burmila said he gave Peterson some consideration for his years as a police officer Kalidurga Feb 2013 #2
It's probably a life sentence anyway BainsBane Feb 2013 #4
I realize that, but it really is the principal of the sentence. Kalidurga Feb 2013 #5
absolutely BainsBane Feb 2013 #6
+1000 - excellent assessment! nt Mnemosyne Feb 2013 #15
Oh, come on Orrex Feb 2013 #24
i agree wholeheartedly.. frylock Feb 2013 #9
Yes, you're right. wickerwoman Feb 2013 #17
I agree also. Reducing this sentence due to previous police/military service is despicable. Owl Feb 2013 #23
Good thing he narrowed that down. Maybe he should have added, "OR STACY!" n/t Bossy Monkey Feb 2013 #3
At least he might not be able to kill wife no 4, it was never going to stop. Thinkingabout Feb 2013 #7
He DID kill liberalhistorian Feb 2013 #21
Sorry you are right, I lost count. Thinkingabout Feb 2013 #29
Please tell me they won't let him out while he appeals. Ken Burch Feb 2013 #8
I doubt it Drale Feb 2013 #27
this dick's final statement makes christopher dorner look positively lucid frylock Feb 2013 #10
This guy deserved life LeftInTX Feb 2013 #11
He has a life sentence. He is 59 and received 38 years. RebelOne Feb 2013 #18
"I'm an obnoxious man by nature, truly." City Lights Feb 2013 #12
Good. musette_sf Feb 2013 #13
deserve's got nothing to do with it... KG Feb 2013 #14
At line from the Unforgiven... awoke_in_2003 Feb 2013 #22
I am troubled by the events of this trial Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #16
Well, they are testifying under oath TexasBushwhacker Feb 2013 #30
The problem is that people testifying, even under oath, Kelvin Mace Feb 2013 #31
I wish there was a hell so that asshole Zoeisright Feb 2013 #19
Wow I thought this was Michael Peterson. XanaDUer Feb 2013 #20
I don't think a person on earth thinks he didn't do it. And this just reinforces that opinion. nolabear Feb 2013 #25
He did that to himself Drale Feb 2013 #28
The man is a psychopath. Beacool Feb 2013 #26
Prick did it but they railroaded him AngryAmish Feb 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Peterson gets 38 years af...»Reply #31