Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal Over Corporate Campaign Contributions

[onenote]

19. No, not "except that"

It was the first amendment that exempted both individual NAACP members and the NAACP as an organization, from liabilty for having conducted and/or participated in a boycott of a racist hardware store.

As noted in a separate post, the courts have always drawn distinctions between types of speech and types of speakers based on whethter there was a sufficiently strong government interest justifying the distinction.

As for the ability of a corporation to jam a EULA or arbitration clause down someone's throat? individuals have the same right to put a EULA or an arbitration clause in at in a contract as a corporation. Whether someone is willing to accept that arrangement is a matter of leverage, not constitutional rights. End user agreements and other forms of enforceable license agreements are indeed contracts.