Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Romney: 'I'm not concerned about the very poor' [View all]
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Wednesday that he's "not concerned about the very poor" because they have an "ample safety net" and he's focused instead on relieving the suffering of middle-class people hit hard by the bad economy.
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON--
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Wednesday that he's "not concerned about the very poor" because they have an "ample safety net" and he's focused instead on relieving the suffering of middle-class people hit hard by the bad economy.
In comments likely to become fodder for his critics, Romney emphasized, "You can focus on the very poor, that's not my focus."
He brought up the subject of the poor in a CNN interview marking his big win in Florida's GOP primary Tuesday night, a major step toward becoming the party's challenger to President Barack Obama in the fall. A multi-millionaire former venture capitalist, Romney has been criticized by Democrats and his Republican rivals alike for earlier remarks seen as insensitive, such as saying "I like being able to fire people" and declaring that he knew what it was like to worry about being "pink-slipped" out of a job.
more: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2017387811_apusromney.html
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Again where the hell do you get the idea that we spent $13 trillion on the War on Poverty?
Bjorn Against
Feb 2012
#39
Okay, well, he did donate like $7 million to charity last year so I think he's okay on that issue.
IndyJones
Feb 2012
#91
By "very poor", Golden Mittens Romney means anyone earning below $300,000 a year.
toddwv
Feb 2012
#5
I worry too -what you said + the sheepie voting block that eats the corp crap doled out for them
lunasun
Feb 2012
#79
Where the hell do you get the idea that $13 trillion was spent on anti-poverty programs?
Bjorn Against
Feb 2012
#37
"....are there no prisons, are there no workhouses? Let them die and decrease the surplus
ladywnch
Feb 2012
#19
Remember how Gingrich once said we need to bring back orphanages to house kids who, he believes,
tblue37
Feb 2012
#85
After Mitten's tax returns were released one can see who's getting the free stuff.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Feb 2012
#48
And the ALEC playbook has state legislatures cutting these "ample safety nets"
MaineDem
Feb 2012
#21
If the poor are okay, why is he concerned about the MC becoming poor? His resume shows that he
patrice
Feb 2012
#30
another example of a Repub demonstrating lack of empathy--true to Ayn Rand & ALEC n/t
hue
Feb 2012
#35
Funny, the morans on RW talk radio are only pissed about the "safety net" comment.
DCBob
Feb 2012
#52
He said the very poor have a safety net. If he considers sleeping on a nice sidewalk
humblebum
Feb 2012
#53
Stupid motherfucker. Can't fucking see past the nose on richassed mugliCON.
lonestarnot
Feb 2012
#74
We need to not focus on this statement. The contrast of what percentage of what he donated to
IndyJones
Feb 2012
#92
I hope this gives comfort to those who thought Gingrich would have been the easier opponent.
DCBob
Feb 2012
#96
First, if the poor DID have an ample safety net, it's no thanks to you, Tax Haven Mitt
wordpix
Feb 2012
#102