Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(1,941 posts)

20. Why would he be involved in oral arguments?

Fri Mar 1, 2013, 09:53 AM

Mar 2013

He's not the attorney for either party involved - it's just an amicus brief.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama administration to express support for gay marriage before Supreme Court [View all] kpete Feb 2013 OP

That will be an amicus I will enjoy reading. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #1

Why would he be involved in oral arguments? 66 dmhlt Mar 2013 #20

Thank you sir. iandhr Feb 2013 #2

Wow.. have we come a long way! Cha Feb 2013 #4

Thanks kpete Feb 2013 #6

Yeah, Cha Feb 2013 #10

Of course.. that's the only Cha Feb 2013 #11

They're too busy hurling abuse to notice what is being Cha Mar 2013 #15

I read obama2terms Feb 2013 #7

...and it is done OKNancy Feb 2013 #9

Thanks OKNancy! Cha Feb 2013 #12

Thank you Mr. President. nt awoke_in_2003 Feb 2013 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author bitchkitty Mar 2013 #17

Whew! Jamastiene Mar 2013 #18

But, but, but ... blkmusclmachine Mar 2013 #19