Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
14. Space stuff has more or less always wound up in the science forum
Sun Mar 3, 2013, 02:21 AM
Mar 2013

The pseudoscience forum is, as much as anything else, one of those "sweep these under the rug" subforums like the I/P or guns forums: one of the main purposes is to give, e.g., electric universe kooks or Apollo landing deniers someplace to post that doesn't end up cluttering the science forum up with all that inanity. Its existence makes the science forum much less of a headache to read, especially compared to a year or so ago when, for some reason I've yet to fully get, we had a few really fanatic electric cosmologists pushing that everywhere they could.

The science forum's also low-traffic enough as is without being split off into several smaller groups.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The good news is that this problem got resolved. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #1
God, I hate two-day old jelly donuts. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #2
The perishable items were some fresh fruit for the astraunauts on the Space Station red dog 1 Mar 2013 #4
feel like an Indiana Jones joke now PatrynXX Mar 2013 #6
Aw that sucks. AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #8
From what I heard, the Dragon's on track to dock on Sunday. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #9
Latest news is that all 4 thrusters are now working (From your link) red dog 1 Mar 2013 #3
Thanls to TexasTowelie for posting this. red dog 1 Mar 2013 #5
You're welcome. TexasTowelie Mar 2013 #7
Too bad the DU "space junkies" don't have their own forum red dog 1 Mar 2013 #11
Space stuff has more or less always wound up in the science forum Posteritatis Mar 2013 #14
You make some good points...Are there really Apollo landing deniers here on DU? red dog 1 Mar 2013 #18
Not as many as a few years ago Posteritatis Mar 2013 #20
actually, the "Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience" forum is for the kentauros Mar 2013 #24
Doh! Yeah, that's the one I was thinking of. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #25
They do, but it's on another website bananas Mar 2013 #16
Thanks for the info red dog 1 Mar 2013 #19
Are these the guys claiming they can send people to Mars within five years? daleo Mar 2013 #10
I don't get what idea you're getting at. kentauros Mar 2013 #12
The point is, a manned flight to Mars is orders of magnitude more difficult than ISS re-supply daleo Mar 2013 #17
Catastrophe will happen whether it's private or public. kentauros Mar 2013 #21
I think calling the rocket's thruster problems "catastrophe" is overstating it some. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2013 #22
I agree. kentauros Mar 2013 #23
My point was that private space ventures have a very slim record of achievement daleo Mar 2013 #27
Imagine if people were in a Mars rocket and an engine burn failed daleo Mar 2013 #26
Totally different group. This will be their second docking with the ISS AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #13
Is Tang perishable? avogadro Mar 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SpaceX rocket launched bu...»Reply #14