Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,869 posts)
3. The question is whether Rodman was used by NK
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 10:45 AM
Mar 2013

As Kerry said (in the CNN article), if NK wants to show they are interested in joining the world, they should not test missiles. Note that he did not condemn Rodman for going to NK - which some in his position would have done.

I agree that we should use every tool we have - and Obama has approved both Bill Clinton and Richardson going there and meeting with him. In other places, Kerry has praised the serious efforts of non diplomats - George Clooney and Ben Afflect - both of whom testified at different times before the SFRC on their observations in Sudan and other places in Africa.

Did you see the Rodman interview? It was pretty much useless. His observations boiled down to - he is young, 28 years old (duh!), likes basketball (already known) and is a "good guy" and he wants Obama to call him. The latter will likely NOT happen until US diplomats have some faith that it could help, but Obama (and Kerry) have been much more willing to speak to people designated foes than any other modern leaders. It is not clear where there is an opening created by Rodman here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I get this and all, but shouldn't we use what we can? bamacrat Mar 2013 #1
No! We'll have every attention seeking, dimwitted celebrity out on Laurian Mar 2013 #2
Very valid point. n/t bamacrat Mar 2013 #7
The question is whether Rodman was used by NK karynnj Mar 2013 #3
A better person to have gone adieu Mar 2013 #4
I don't know what "sets a pick" means, but Kerry rightly need to discourage TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #5
It basically means to cut off another player's progress. n/t bluedigger Mar 2013 #11
I Don't Know Where DU'ers Here Line Up On Rodman But..... global1 Mar 2013 #6
If Kim Jr. wanted to change things he could simply change them. Arkana Mar 2013 #8
Maybe This Was Un's Way Of Giving Us An Approving Nod...... global1 Mar 2013 #9
If so, why the missile tests at the same time? karynnj Mar 2013 #10
He may have an entrenched MynameisBlarney Mar 2013 #13
In his TV interview, Rodman said North Korea and the US were the same when it came to human rights. Mass Mar 2013 #12
I agree w/ Rodman jaysunb Mar 2013 #14
Those who 'conclude the same thing' have no idea what they are talking about RZM Mar 2013 #17
Obama: 'Yo Kim, how about those Brooklyn Nets?' RZM Mar 2013 #16
Who the fuck are you to decide who, what and where is wrong ? jaysunb Mar 2013 #18
What kind of pick They_Live Mar 2013 #15
I still do not believe defacto7 Mar 2013 #19
At the point of stating the obvious, if Lil Kim were serious about changing geek tragedy Mar 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»John Kerry sets a pick on...»Reply #3