Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(1,230 posts)

8. LOL. Don't the French, British and Australians, who all have just committed to staying through 2014

Wed Feb 1, 2012, 07:44 PM

Feb 2012

look silly now? I guess, they still could stay and fight on without the US.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Panetta: U.S., NATO will seek to end Afghan combat mission next year [View all] kpete Feb 2012 OP

I had a feeling that was coming. nt bemildred Feb 2012 #1

You won't hear me complaining. nt WheelWalker Feb 2012 #2

Let's do it now! sinkingfeeling Feb 2012 #3

What we've been waiting for (most of us); rec'd! nt babylonsister Feb 2012 #4

Unless Mitt Romney wins... Drunken Irishman Feb 2012 #5

Uhh did you hit Q when you really wanted N? alp227 Feb 2012 #7

How 'bout the trifecta? Drunken Irishman Feb 2012 #9

Should've never, ever invaded and occupied in the first place. David__77 Feb 2012 #6

OR, they'd be very happy to get the heck out earlier. nt babylonsister Feb 2012 #11

Good timing. DCBob Feb 2012 #10

Spam deleted by Stinky The Clown (MIR Team) pipipeng Feb 2012 #13

Geez, this should be the biggest discussion on DU today. WTH. phleshdef Feb 2012 #14

Don't know who's advising POTUS now musiclawyer Feb 2012 #15

'Ending the combat mission' is a vague goal, open to definition. Lasher Feb 2012 #16