Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Govt Report: We Wasted a Ton of Money in Iraq [View all]Towlie
(5,575 posts)25. The title is an understatement by a factor of 661.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/report-too-much-money-spent-in-iraq-for-too-few-results.php?ref=fpa
WASHINGTON (AP) Ten years and $60 billion in American taxpayer funds later, Iraq is still so unstable and broken that even its leaders question whether U.S. efforts to rebuild the war-torn nation were worth the cost.
A $100 bill weighs about one gram. $60 billion in $100 bills would be 600,000,000 bills, which would weigh 600,000,000 grams, or 600 tonnes ("metric tons"
Incidentally, at 0.0043 inches of thickness per bill, this amounts to a stack of $100 bills over 40 miles high.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DUers have known that ever since Blackwater got the contract, along with KBR and Halliburton
loudsue
Mar 2013
#1
I think the Bush administration accomplished it's mission. the relocated the treasury from the govt.
olddad56
Mar 2013
#27
since we were spending about 2 billion a WEEK between afghanistan and iraq, that 60 billion
niyad
Mar 2013
#2
That's just in reconstruction grants. Add $2trillion in war costs and $12 billion that went MISSING
blm
Mar 2013
#6
Three colleigate-level Iraqis and a trained monkey could have run that occupation better than Bremer
Volaris
Mar 2013
#73
good one, anyone who even begins to take this story serious is in danger of becoming a republican.
olddad56
Mar 2013
#60
60 billion is likely only reconstruction funds. Running an army is far higher.
Selatius
Mar 2013
#57
I think it's the "schools and hospitals" budget, not the "killing people" budget
Kolesar
Mar 2013
#54
Or the 6.6 Billion in pallets of $100 dollar bills flown to Iraq that was "lost"
progressoid
Mar 2013
#42
But you can't force "austerity" without using up all the money and owing serious debt. n/t
Fire Walk With Me
Mar 2013
#45
+1 - "Lost" in the "fog of war"= major theft, money laundering - ask KBR, Halliburton, Blackwater
wordpix
Mar 2013
#58