Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
23. The Carter Doctrine: it's all about the oil.
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 11:14 AM
Mar 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Doctrine

The Carter Doctrine was a policy proclaimed by President of the United States Jimmy Carter in his State of the Union Address on January 23, 1980, which stated that the U.S. would use military force if necessary to defend its national interests in the Persian Gulf region. The doctrine was a response to the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, and was intended to deter the Soviet Union—the U.S.' Cold War adversary—from seeking hegemony in the Gulf. After stating that Soviet troops in Afghanistan posed "a grave threat to the free movement of Middle East oil," Carter proclaimed:

The region which is now threatened by Soviet troops in Afghanistan is of great strategic importance: It contains more than two-thirds of the world's exportable oil. The Soviet effort to dominate Afghanistan has brought Soviet military forces to within 300 miles of the Indian Ocean and close to the Straits of Hormuz, a waterway through which most of the world's oil must flow. The Soviet Union is now attempting to consolidate a strategic position, therefore, that poses a grave threat to the free movement of Middle East oil.

This situation demands careful thought, steady nerves, and resolute action, not only for this year but for many years to come. It demands collective efforts to meet this new threat to security in the Persian Gulf and in Southwest Asia. It demands the participation of all those who rely on oil from the Middle East and who are concerned with global peace and stability. And it demands consultation and close cooperation with countries in the area which might be threatened.

Meeting this challenge will take national will, diplomatic and political wisdom, economic sacrifice, and, of course, military capability. We must call on the best that is in us to preserve the security of this crucial region.

Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.


This last, key sentence of the doctrine, was written by Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's National Security Adviser. Brzezinski modeled the wording of the doctrine on the Truman Doctrine,[1] and insisted that the sentence be included in the speech "to make it very clear that the Soviets should stay away from the Persian Gulf."[2]

In The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power, author Daniel Yergin notes that the Carter Doctrine "bore striking similarities" to a 1903 British declaration, in which British Foreign Secretary Lord Landsdowne warned Russia and Germany that the British would "regard the establishment of a naval base or of a fortified port in the Persian Gulf by any other power as a very grave menace to British interests, and we should certainly resist it with all the means at our disposal."[3]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So here are these two countries: Xipe Totec Mar 2013 #1
+1 newfie11 Mar 2013 #2
Oil? Nope. Scootaloo Mar 2013 #5
Think deeper. Why would we have an interest in the Middle East anyway? Xipe Totec Mar 2013 #7
Well, here's a question. Scootaloo Mar 2013 #10
The Carter Doctrine: it's all about the oil. bananas Mar 2013 #23
Is it possible it could be all of that and a few other things also to some degree? nolabels Mar 2013 #24
just because you fail to implement a plan, does not mean that was not the plan magical thyme Mar 2013 #25
The important thing is he's found a way to blame it on "Teh Joos." Ian David Mar 2013 #13
Scootaloo is correct cpwm17 Mar 2013 #39
The only difference is... Bohemianwriter Mar 2013 #19
His name is Zinn not Zimm tazzersgoldenangel Mar 2013 #30
Noticed that... Bohemianwriter Mar 2013 #41
Message auto-removed hk59298igg Mar 2013 #32
Location, location, location. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #22
^ This. nt Poll_Blind Mar 2013 #36
So, a couple of days ago little Un says he wants LeftofObama Mar 2013 #3
The Generals . . . another_liberal Mar 2013 #16
It's time to send in SEAL Team 6 and take out Submariner Mar 2013 #4
Not our job. n/t magellan Mar 2013 #8
Because it's that simple, right? Posteritatis Mar 2013 #37
They are delusional idiots davidpdx Mar 2013 #6
Kim Jong Boo Boo throwing another tantrum ... and in other news ... water is still wet Snake Plissken Mar 2013 #9
You know, for a few minutes there when Un first came to power... RevStPatrick Mar 2013 #11
The Day North Korea Launches a Nuclear Strike Against the US Andy Stanton Mar 2013 #12
They may not care. I think THAT prospect is most frightening. closeupready Mar 2013 #34
Well, I gotta tell you . . . OldRedneck Mar 2013 #14
They can't very likely hit us . . . another_liberal Mar 2013 #15
It would be... Volaris Mar 2013 #18
I doubt that . . . another_liberal Mar 2013 #33
North Korea: "This is a recording. Thank you for waiting" DinahMoeHum Mar 2013 #17
Envoy Dennis Rodman didn't get it done, huh? Dustlawyer Mar 2013 #20
It would go something like this... slackmaster Mar 2013 #21
After the nuclear nightmare in Japan this threat is very yesterday . peace13 Mar 2013 #26
U.N. Security Council approves new sanctions against North Korea jsr Mar 2013 #27
Even China is growing tired of the NK's temper tantrums. Pararescue Mar 2013 #28
AP sucks. It's become a "Sensational Headline" contest. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #29
It's so entertaining BigDemVoter Mar 2013 #31
NK's dictator is going to be even madder now. Don't you just hate it when pampango Mar 2013 #35
They're going to burn popcorn in the break room microwave and stink up the hall? Throd Mar 2013 #38
I wonder how rational the political leadership of the US would be ronnie624 Mar 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Furious over sanctions, N...»Reply #23