Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Seedersandleechers

(3,044 posts)
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 11:01 AM Dec 2011

Bradley Manning pre-trial hearing opens amid tight security [View all]

Bradley Manning has been seen in public for the first time since he was arrested in Iraq in May 2010 for allegedly leaking hundreds of thousands of secret US state documents to WikiLeaks.

Security was exceptionally – some say bizarrely – tight at the opening on Friday of Manning's pre-trial hearing at Fort Meade in Maryland. Though a small number of seats in the military courtroom were reserved for members of the public, rigid reporting restrictions remained in place that prevent any live coverage of the proceedings.

The full charge sheet against Manning was released for the first time. It includes a total of 23 counts against the soldier, the most serious of which is that Manning knowingly gave "intelligence to the enemy, though indirect means".

The idea that WikiLeaks constituted an "enemy", or a conduit to an enemy of the US state, will in itself be subject of much debate and legal argument. A second charge follows a similar theme, and accuses of Manning of causing information to be published "having knowledge that intelligence published on the internet is accessible to the enemy"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/16/bradley-manning-military-hearing-wikileaks


20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Updates on this link dipsydoodle Dec 2011 #1
Great updates! Thank you for the link. EFerrari Dec 2011 #2
Manning's lawyer asks investigator to step down struggle4progress Dec 2011 #3
Manning Hearing Halted as Investigator Considers Recusal Request struggle4progress Dec 2011 #4
Hero bottom line Dec 2011 #5
He should be in jail for the rest of his life. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #6
? bottom line Dec 2011 #7
No Text - I wrote nothing in the message text box. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #8
Thanks bottom line Dec 2011 #10
Yes, he's a hero. Little Tich Dec 2011 #14
At Manning Hearing, Investigator Refuses Recusal struggle4progress Dec 2011 #9
No reasonable person could look at the DoJ vendetta against Wikileaks and at EFerrari Dec 2011 #11
Maybe but maybe not, the question really is simply if he gave cstanleytech Dec 2011 #12
No, the question is about the venue he is being tried in. EFerrari Dec 2011 #13
Since he is or was part of the military he will be tried before whatever cstanleytech Dec 2011 #15
This issue is or was if the investigator assigned is biased and should recuse himself. EFerrari Dec 2011 #16
Interesting but how does any bias if it exists on the part cstanleytech Dec 2011 #17
I am talking about the individual who is adjudicating the hearing. EFerrari Dec 2011 #18
Ah ok, thanks for clearing it up. cstanleytech Dec 2011 #19
Manning's problem is that motive is irrelevant to his charges hack89 Dec 2011 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bradley Manning pre-trial...