Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Venezuela to probe Chavez cancer poisoning accusation [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)17. easily done
I'm going to stay out of this and just wait for the results of the scientific investigation which I am convinced the Venezuelans are quite capable of managing without input from anonymous forum posters.
But, since you asked, and I had already tried, just out of curiosity, to find such scientific articles, here is what came up within seconds, didn't do any other "research", though:
Summary
For 152 days rats were fed a diet containing 0.25% of N-methylbenzylamine and sodium nitrite in concentrations from 0.32% down to 0.01%. Esophageal tumors were observed in all rats of a group when the concentration of sodium nitrite was 0.32%, 0.16% or 0.08%. No esophageal tumors were induced when the concentration was 0.06%, 0,4%, 0.02% or 0.01%. Out of 8 rats receiving a diet mixted with 0.3% of sodium nitrite and drinking water containing 0.6% N-methylbenzylamine one developed a carcinoma of the nose, none developed esophageal tumors. 10 out of 10 mice receiving for 16 days a diet containing 0.1% N-methylbenzylamine and 0.15% NaNO2 developed carcinomas of the forestomach and partly papillomas of the esophagus but only 3 out of 10 mice died from carcinomas of the forestomach when the diet contained 0.1% of the amine and 0.1% NaNO2 (fed for 16. days). The problems involved in ingestion of low dosages of a secondary amine and nitrite are discussed shortly.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00284420?LI=true
For 152 days rats were fed a diet containing 0.25% of N-methylbenzylamine and sodium nitrite in concentrations from 0.32% down to 0.01%. Esophageal tumors were observed in all rats of a group when the concentration of sodium nitrite was 0.32%, 0.16% or 0.08%. No esophageal tumors were induced when the concentration was 0.06%, 0,4%, 0.02% or 0.01%. Out of 8 rats receiving a diet mixted with 0.3% of sodium nitrite and drinking water containing 0.6% N-methylbenzylamine one developed a carcinoma of the nose, none developed esophageal tumors. 10 out of 10 mice receiving for 16 days a diet containing 0.1% N-methylbenzylamine and 0.15% NaNO2 developed carcinomas of the forestomach and partly papillomas of the esophagus but only 3 out of 10 mice died from carcinomas of the forestomach when the diet contained 0.1% of the amine and 0.1% NaNO2 (fed for 16. days). The problems involved in ingestion of low dosages of a secondary amine and nitrite are discussed shortly.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00284420?LI=true
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
173 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The justifible theory is that much like the US tried to assasinate Castro the succeeded with Chavez
Exultant Democracy
Mar 2013
#113
At most 15% is very different then 15%, you need to read closer. Your answer is also in the text.
Exultant Democracy
Apr 2013
#169
Yes, they expose rats without cancer to potential carcinogens. As experiments.
geek tragedy
Mar 2013
#18
the opposition and their loudspeakers here have certainly focused on Chavez' death
reorg
Mar 2013
#91
Pointing out facts isnt petty, calling someone petty for pointing out facts is though. nt
cstanleytech
Mar 2013
#124
Mike, the thing is there isnt a single overall cure and age plays a factor it would appear
cstanleytech
Mar 2013
#120
So you are now saying I was wrong to assume you were just new to the forum
cstanleytech
Apr 2013
#156
You were the one that said I was "stalking you" mikey, I just thought you were new and unaware of
cstanleytech
Apr 2013
#158
It's not crazy in light of the poisoning of Litvinenko, and possible poisoning of Arafat
yurbud
Mar 2013
#53
pop quiz: what did people downwind of nuclear tests die at unusually high rates of?
yurbud
Mar 2013
#77
They don't want to come back to scuffle, which they love so dearly. What a shame,
Judi Lynn
Mar 2013
#141