Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Feinstein Snaps At Cruz: ‘I’m Not A Sixth Grader’ [View all]bossy22
(3,547 posts)that is the key. No one is arguing that there aren't constitutional limits on gun ownership- the issue is that the statement is used to defend "every proposed limit". The question is, where does it end? No, you can't yell fire in a crowded theatre- but neither can you shoot guns in the air for celebration in an urban environment. I'm willing to hear people out on what constitutes reasonable, but atleast come with a credible logical argument- Don't come with stupid catch phrases.
This equally applies to those stupid comments made by many gun control proponents such as "there are laws limiting hunters to 3 rounds for deer, but no laws on hunting humans with 100 round magazines". How could anyone accept this kind of statement? Last time i checked if you hunt a human- you go to jail FOR A LONG LONG TIME. arent laws against murder the strongest laws on our books?
The gun control debate always gets hijacked by people who prey on low information voters.