Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Feinstein Snaps At Cruz: ‘I’m Not A Sixth Grader’ [View all]bossy22
(3,547 posts)39. No I haven't
Yes, statutes are different state to state, but there is a generally agreed upon definition of those offenses. A person who kills another person during a robbery might be charged with Murder 1 in state A, and murder 2 in state B- but I don't think you would have a situation where one state charges such an individual with murder 1, and the other charges them with 2nd degree manslaughter.
Their is no logic behind the definition- that is the core of the issue. It is a catch-all term for whatever anyone wants it to be. For example, the weapons featured below are assault weapons under new york statute, but by no other state's statute.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Where was Cruz when police attacked the Occupy camps that were peacefully petitioning
JDPriestly
Mar 2013
#22
just because we have limits on rights, doesn't mean all limits are constitutional
bossy22
Mar 2013
#25
Democrats need to talk like this consistently. There's no point in pretending you're having a tea
yurbud
Mar 2013
#5
A junior male senator "mansplaining" to a senior female senator... what could go wrong? nt
DRoseDARs
Mar 2013
#13
What does not make sense is a weapon on the streets which are capable of blowing up people and
Thinkingabout
Mar 2013
#29
Maybe we should expend the ban, include all high caliber weapons, would that make your happier?
Thinkingabout
Mar 2013
#35
Then accept sensible weapons and get the weapons used in mass killings ban, we don't need our
Thinkingabout
Mar 2013
#40
If the shooter is limited to firing only 10 rounds instead of 33 and more in other cases it would
Thinkingabout
Mar 2013
#46
High capacity capabilities is on the table also but when the ammo explodes it is another problem.
Thinkingabout
Mar 2013
#48
Either you are a TeaPublican troll or a TeaLeftist extremist purist. Either way, sell it elsewhere.
RBInMaine
Mar 2013
#36
Please refute the content rather than attack the poster. It's far to easy to say, I dislike what
24601
Mar 2013
#55
Cruz is running true to form, you elect a TP candidate and you get stupid statements and run from
Thinkingabout
Mar 2013
#31