Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 07:24 PM Feb 2012

Senate approves insider-trading bill (96-3) [View all]

Washington (CNN) -- A bill that clarifies the illegality of insider trading of stocks and other securities by members of Congress and their staff members won approval Thursday from the U.S. Senate.

The 96-3 vote sends the measure to the House, which is expected to take it up in coming weeks.

In addition to making clear that insider trading laws and penalties apply to those on Capitol Hill, the bill requires lawmakers and their staffs to report any stocks, bonds or other securities they buy or sell within 30 days of the transaction.

President Barack Obama expressed support for the bill in his State of the Union address, and the Senate vote showed bipartisan support despite the deep partisan divide in Congress exacerbated by the upcoming November election.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/02/politics/senate-insider-trading/index.html

-----

Roll call votes: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00014

NAYs - 3 - Bingaman (D-NM), Burr (R-NC), Coburn (R-OK)
Not Voting - 1 - Kirk (R-IL)



27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They should call this the Martha Stewart bill. nm rhett o rick Feb 2012 #1
Only 53 cases were brought in 2010 (out of billions of trades) KurtNYC Feb 2012 #27
Now who voted no? Drunken Irishman Feb 2012 #2
As it says in the OP ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #4
I had same question flakey_foont Feb 2012 #6
Here ya go ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #10
Thanks flakey_foont Feb 2012 #16
I definitely understand Kirk not voting. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2012 #25
OP has been updated Tx4obama Feb 2012 #11
Thanks. Looks like three crooks (Kirk gets a pass). Drunken Irishman Feb 2012 #14
Wow. I'll admit I'm pleasantly surprised. Robb Feb 2012 #3
I will guarantee you that this is just a shell game... originalpckelly Feb 2012 #5
Are one of those 3 votes a procedural thing? n/t Ian David Feb 2012 #7
I don't think so. The only time Senator Reid votes no on a good bill is when ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #8
Marking to follow up for roll call nt Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #9
OP has been updated Tx4obama Feb 2012 #12
Hrm - wonder what their agendas are? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #15
There were several amendments voted on before the bill, one rejected one was from Coburn ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #17
Thanks for the link Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #18
More from the Wash Post: Minor Senate bill transformed into broad reform package alp227 Feb 2012 #13
Does this have any impact on them using spouses and or immediate family members to cstanleytech Feb 2012 #19
Excellent Question. I immediately wondered the same thing. There must be some loophole for this to cyberpj Feb 2012 #26
Statement by President Obama on Passage of the STOCK Act Tx4obama Feb 2012 #20
"I called on Congress to pass a bill.." Call your local congress person. The Wielding Truth Feb 2012 #23
This is great news! I did not expect it to pass. IndyJones Feb 2012 #21
Now we have to see what The House will do. There is already a rumor that Eric Cantor will be Tx4obama Feb 2012 #22
Yes, this good,but.... Hotler Feb 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate approves insider-t...