Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts)
16. Pennsylvania H.B. 683
Sun Mar 17, 2013, 06:26 PM
Mar 2013

would not only prevent filming and online posting of farming operations, but would take it a step further and effectively prevent filming and posting of fracking operations, which are often done on private farmland.

http://www.damascuscitizensforsustainability.org/2013/03/say-no-to-pa-house-bill-683/

"Further, with the increase in gas drilling in PA, HB683 is doubly troubling: Line 9 on page 1 defines the proposed second and third degree felonies as those “Interfering with agricultural operations.” But Lines 9-11 on page 3 too broadly define “Agricultural operations” as “Any public or private property where an agricultural activity or farming is conducted or takes place.” This includes the sites of much of PA’s gas drilling, storage and transfer activities. Citizen activism is an increasingly important tool for We The People to find out about gas-related crimes and pollution. HB683 would seemingly outlaw reporting on these threats to our air, water and dirt."

See also JPZenger's post at: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10743405

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

cuz you wont eat it once you see and know!! lunasun Mar 2013 #1
But not end animal abuse. How cruel and awful. Cleita Mar 2013 #2
Some bills make it illegal to take photographs at a farming operation. Lenomsky Mar 2013 #3
Here's a better idea, why not end farm animal abuse? ck4829 Mar 2013 #4
I'm not even surprised sulphurdunn Mar 2013 #5
Me too. subterranean Mar 2013 #9
ALEC is the real SPECTRE n2doc Mar 2013 #12
+ 1000 red dog 1 Mar 2013 #21
What about transparent government? Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2013 #6
Do we need to ask.... penndragon69 Mar 2013 #7
That's a rhetorical question, right? subterranean Mar 2013 #10
Chipping away at our democracy... UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #8
what a terrible terrible thing to do! Keep the crimes hidden?! robinlynne Mar 2013 #11
The problem is that the vast majority of Americans veganlush Mar 2013 #13
++1 CrispyQ Mar 2013 #32
exactly. veganlush Mar 2013 #36
if you want to see an end to the abuse veganlush Mar 2013 #14
I agree with you, veganlush. If people even cut their meat consumption in half, it Flaxbee Mar 2013 #15
i know, it's a very interesting veganlush Mar 2013 #25
Or raise your own. n/t fasttense Mar 2013 #24
Absolutely! Brainstormy Mar 2013 #29
Pennsylvania H.B. 683 grntuscarora Mar 2013 #16
How could this possibly comply with the First Amendment? SunSeeker Mar 2013 #17
It doesn't. The Stranger Mar 2013 #34
I thought this was such a good post... Omaha Steve Mar 2013 #18
Thanks to Judi Lynn for posting this. red dog 1 Mar 2013 #19
This has already happened in Florida. secondvariety Mar 2013 #20
Living in the land of "Happy Cows" Plucketeer Mar 2013 #22
The Sweep It Under the Carpet Act marble falls Mar 2013 #23
Why not Newest Reality Mar 2013 #26
This is a violation of free speech. truthisfreedom Mar 2013 #27
Well I guess end free speech then get the red out Mar 2013 #28
They're called AG GAG laws Brainstormy Mar 2013 #30
How did we get to documenting the act is worse than the act? MindPilot Mar 2013 #31
This is protected under the First Amendment. The Stranger Mar 2013 #33
Creepy, evil, and dangerous side-effects of privitazation Blue Owl Mar 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bills seek end to farm an...»Reply #16