Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The king is about to hand down his decree! nt Ed Suspicious Mar 2013 #1
You do realize it is quite legal/constitutional and why ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #2
Nominally, perhaps. Cal Carpenter Mar 2013 #5
Every state has some form of takeover legislation ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #6
So legal doesn't equate with democracy and no I do not understand. Explain if you have time. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #8
Much like I stated in post #6 ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #9
Read. So run out of money = no democracy and a takeover punishment from the state. I'm not lonestarnot Mar 2013 #11
Legally its more a case of the state rescuing its citizens from an incompetent agent ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #12
I think you are full of crap. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #13
I agree with that assesment. Ed Suspicious Mar 2013 #14
I found the concept odd myself until I looked into it ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #17
Your ideas are odd. What did you conclude after your research? lonestarnot Mar 2013 #18
That legally the state is responsible at some level for its sub-entities ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #19
And just where do you think they get the power to regulate? lonestarnot Mar 2013 #20
The EFM serves at the pleasure of the governor ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #23
Unelected official override of democracy and it's bullshit. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #24
I did not realize that the Michigan Governor was unelected... ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #26
He may have cheated his way in, but however he got there, he is obviously not representing. And NO, lonestarnot Mar 2013 #28
That is the legal concept...never said I agree with it being used on Detroit ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #16
If you don't agree with it, why are you trying to push it over here and then trying to step lonestarnot Mar 2013 #21
I am trying to explain the legal justification for it and why it is not a loss of representation ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #22
Explain all fucking night. There is no justification for quashing democracy and what do you mean lonestarnot Mar 2013 #25
What would you suggest be done when a city is as screwed up as Bell or Benton Harbor? ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #27
Gerrymandering is not representative. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #29
So both Democratic governors I cited are guilty of gerrymandering? ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #30
I'm not talking about democrats. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #31
No its' NOT! LovingA2andMI Mar 2013 #3
the press briefing... Javaman Mar 2013 #4
Good one! classof56 Mar 2013 #10
So no money and all of a sudden no fucking democracy. WTF! lonestarnot Mar 2013 #7
i sincerely hope this is the last straw 0rganism Mar 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Detroit emergency manager...»Reply #23