Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
20. Statement by President Obama on Passage of the STOCK Act
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 03:36 AM
Feb 2012

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
February 02, 2012
Statement by the President on Passage of the STOCK Act

In my State of the Union Address, I laid out a blueprint for an economy built to last, where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules – especially those of us who have been sent here to serve the American people.

Last week, I called on Congress to pass a bill that makes clear that Members of Congress may not engage in insider trading. No one should be able to trade stocks based on nonpublic information gleaned on Capitol Hill. So I’m pleased the Senate took bipartisan action to pass the STOCK Act. I urge the House of Representatives to pass this bill, and I will sign it right away.

And while this is an important step to rebuild the trust between Washington and the American people, there is much more work to be done, like prohibiting elected officials from owning stocks in industries they impact, and prohibiting people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress from lobbying Congress, an idea that has bipartisan support outside of Washington. These are straightforward proposals that will help eliminate the corrosive influence of money in politics.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/02/02/statement-president-passage-stock-act




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They should call this the Martha Stewart bill. nm rhett o rick Feb 2012 #1
Only 53 cases were brought in 2010 (out of billions of trades) KurtNYC Feb 2012 #27
Now who voted no? Drunken Irishman Feb 2012 #2
As it says in the OP ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #4
I had same question flakey_foont Feb 2012 #6
Here ya go ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #10
Thanks flakey_foont Feb 2012 #16
I definitely understand Kirk not voting. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2012 #25
OP has been updated Tx4obama Feb 2012 #11
Thanks. Looks like three crooks (Kirk gets a pass). Drunken Irishman Feb 2012 #14
Wow. I'll admit I'm pleasantly surprised. Robb Feb 2012 #3
I will guarantee you that this is just a shell game... originalpckelly Feb 2012 #5
Are one of those 3 votes a procedural thing? n/t Ian David Feb 2012 #7
I don't think so. The only time Senator Reid votes no on a good bill is when ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #8
Marking to follow up for roll call nt Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #9
OP has been updated Tx4obama Feb 2012 #12
Hrm - wonder what their agendas are? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #15
There were several amendments voted on before the bill, one rejected one was from Coburn ... Tx4obama Feb 2012 #17
Thanks for the link Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #18
More from the Wash Post: Minor Senate bill transformed into broad reform package alp227 Feb 2012 #13
Does this have any impact on them using spouses and or immediate family members to cstanleytech Feb 2012 #19
Excellent Question. I immediately wondered the same thing. There must be some loophole for this to cyberpj Feb 2012 #26
Statement by President Obama on Passage of the STOCK Act Tx4obama Feb 2012 #20
"I called on Congress to pass a bill.." Call your local congress person. The Wielding Truth Feb 2012 #23
This is great news! I did not expect it to pass. IndyJones Feb 2012 #21
Now we have to see what The House will do. There is already a rumor that Eric Cantor will be Tx4obama Feb 2012 #22
Yes, this good,but.... Hotler Feb 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate approves insider-t...»Reply #20