Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,286 posts)
4. Manning Hearing Halted as Investigator Considers Recusal Request
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 02:54 PM
Dec 2011

... Colonel Paul Almanza said he did not believe he was biased because he does not currently supervise criminal cases in his job at the Justice Department and his work involves child abuse and obscenity, not national security. But he noted that military rules require him to recuse himself if a “reasonable person” might perceive bias, and he broke off the hearing at midday to consider the matter, with a decision possible Friday afternoon ...

If Colonel Almanza declines to recuse himself, Mr. Coombs said he would seek a stay of the hearing while the recusal question is appealed to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. If the case proceeds to court-martial, the military judge appointed to oversee the trial could consider the defense claim of bias and send the case back for a new hearing ...

“This is one of the most interesting military cases of the last 20 years,” said Eugene R. Fidell, who teaches military justice at Yale. Mr. Fidell said the case comes at the intersection of advancing technology, making it possible to lay bare a truckload of secrets on the Web with the click of a mouse, and the culture of the Facebook era in which nothing stays secret for long ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/17/us/bradley-manning-accused-of-aiding-wikileaks-will-appear-in-military-court.html?_r=1

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Updates on this link dipsydoodle Dec 2011 #1
Great updates! Thank you for the link. EFerrari Dec 2011 #2
Manning's lawyer asks investigator to step down struggle4progress Dec 2011 #3
Manning Hearing Halted as Investigator Considers Recusal Request struggle4progress Dec 2011 #4
Hero bottom line Dec 2011 #5
He should be in jail for the rest of his life. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #6
? bottom line Dec 2011 #7
No Text - I wrote nothing in the message text box. nt hack89 Dec 2011 #8
Thanks bottom line Dec 2011 #10
Yes, he's a hero. Little Tich Dec 2011 #14
At Manning Hearing, Investigator Refuses Recusal struggle4progress Dec 2011 #9
No reasonable person could look at the DoJ vendetta against Wikileaks and at EFerrari Dec 2011 #11
Maybe but maybe not, the question really is simply if he gave cstanleytech Dec 2011 #12
No, the question is about the venue he is being tried in. EFerrari Dec 2011 #13
Since he is or was part of the military he will be tried before whatever cstanleytech Dec 2011 #15
This issue is or was if the investigator assigned is biased and should recuse himself. EFerrari Dec 2011 #16
Interesting but how does any bias if it exists on the part cstanleytech Dec 2011 #17
I am talking about the individual who is adjudicating the hearing. EFerrari Dec 2011 #18
Ah ok, thanks for clearing it up. cstanleytech Dec 2011 #19
Manning's problem is that motive is irrelevant to his charges hack89 Dec 2011 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bradley Manning pre-trial...»Reply #4