Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Teenager Mistakes Little Brother for Intruder, Shoots Him [View all]sir pball
(5,349 posts)I don't really like the current shield laws for manufacturers; I think they're too broad and loose - but at the same time I think this is a possibility as to what could happen if unlimited lawsuits were allowed.
Manufacturers, despise the popular perception, are extraordinarily scrupulous about how their products are initially distributed, due to the really bad consequences if they're found to be playing fast and loose (despite even the immunity laws). And of course, after they wholesale the guns they lose control; that can get dicey too, if there's a very good operation diverting the guns at that level but making it all look legitimate. I'd be totally OK with trashing the shield laws given a strong (every gun sold goes on a 4473) traceability framework and then only allowing suits when there's question as to said traceability, with a loser-pays rider to boot.
I'm not a particular friend of the gun industry, don't own any stock in them, but I do admit there's a good possibility for an avalanche of knowingly-unwinnable lawsuits against them with the express purpose of killing them.